How about I stick to whatever topic I feel like talking about because I'd still be offering much more than you do to the conversation which shouldn't be hard seeing how you offer absolutely nothing...
floyd always gets labled a duck but why does no one ever bring up the fact pac didnt fight nate campbell, mark too sharp johnson, rafeal marquez, julio diaz, zahir raheem or tim austin.... Why arent these labled ducks or ever brought up but margarito, paul williams, and every other fight that didnt happen for floyd brought up?
the same arguments that will be made for pac man can or will be used for floyd as to why he didnt fight margarito but why are these fights never brought up as ducks or fights pac could have taken but didnt...
just trying to have a discussion before i leave work!
Because he was fighting the likes of Morales, Barrera and Marquez
I just saw Pacquiao's latest training vid and he has a shiner on his right eye, who ever he was sparring with wasn't holding back; which is good news. Going one-hundred rounds with these rising prospects will test Pacquiao the same way Errol Spence tested Floyd.
I just saw Pacquiao's latest training vid and he has a shiner on his right eye, who ever he was sparring with wasn't holding back; which is good news. Going one-hundred rounds with these rising prospects will test Pacquiao the same way Errol Spence tested Floyd.
Tweet
Comment