-
-
I'm boxingscene's Christopher Colombus, when I said Broner would do the Booty Dew against Maidana everyone laughed, I also prophesized this fight would be a close bout with the winners side claiming shutout. It's only a matter of time before the dust settles and people realise I was correct in my analysis, it will take a while but people will eventually see what I and many others saw.
Okay I just realised that most people didn't think the earth was flat in Colombus' time so he wasn't much of a heretic, but I am a modern day heretic, I'll be proved right sooner or later, you'l all see.
All of you!Comment
-
You said Floyd would win, you said Pacquaio would knock him out, you said it would be close. You couldn't lose because you picked every possible outcome.
Modern day Nostradamus you mate.
Oh yeah you also picked George Groves to destroy Froch in the rematch and also destroy Andre Ward.Last edited by IronDanHamza; 06-06-2015, 02:35 PM.Comment
-
Loooool. You want kudos for realising Broner sucks? I'll take some of that also then. Close fight? Nope.
Who are these "many others"? You got asked to name the credible boxing professionals who thought it was close, and named two people followed by "etc etc". Nice try. You definitely can't name any more than that.Comment
-
You tried to analyze 1 round (ROUND 3) and even after viewing the round over and over again including gifs from both sides (ie. different point of views) and seeing that Floyd had very few clean good punches and that Manny had the better shots at Floyd, you couldn't get that right.
So you sir are the wrong person to talk about scoring!
Comment
-
Yes!It's laughable, the whole notion Floyd dominated, only people with an agenda say this(Pac haters, Floyd diehards).
It's very bemusing, British commentators after the 3rd Marquez fight harped on about "Manny vision" giving Manny too much credit for minor things and overplaying his performances, but we're seeing the exact same thing with Floyd. Manny has to fight a certain way, set a certain pace, and if he isn't it's because Floyd is making him fight at that pace, it can't be that Manny planned to fight that way could it? "Manny has to throw more punches, do this do that, it's one of Floyd's easiest fights"
But what is Floyd doing? don't you win fights by landing punches? Oh that's right, he's "setting the pace" 
just do the bare minimum, make sure the commentators are licking your arse, land the odd tapping right hand that will ensure you get the biased replay's during the break and the fight is yours. As song as the other guy doesn't badly hurt you or knock you down you win the round.
The highlights for the most impressive punches landed clearly favour Manny... and his defence is criminally underrated, CRIMINALLY UNDERRATED DEFENCE!
When I watched the fight live on TV I saw most of rounds as extremelly close. Both guys landed very few punches, both landed flush, so it's hard to tell who got the round. And all my friends saw the same picture.
I'm from Russia, and russian commentator also noticed mainly Floyd successes, I don't
know why. Probably it's difficult to make comments and watch with attention at the same time. The same story was with a fight Mathysse Provodnikov. Our commentators missed many clear Ruslan punches, they talked only about Mathysse success.
And + for Manny's defence. When we saw Floyd's rights hand countered last time?Comment
-
Dude, STFU. You know **** all about boxing. I'm not wasting time conversing with you.You tried to analyze 1 round (ROUND 3) and even after viewing the round over and over again including gifs from both sides (ie. different point of views) and seeing that Floyd had very few clean good punches and that Manny had the better shots at Floyd, you couldn't get that right.
So you sir are the wrong person to talk about scoring!Comment
Tweet
Comment