New Ring P4P ratings
Collapse
-
-
No it would have been a majority draw and only a one point swing. Provodnikov won the round 10-9 and would have had one extra point giving him a draw on 2 sorecards and a one point loss on the third. But who gives a ****, if my aunt had a **** she would be my uncle.
And I'm not dis*****g the first Pac fight but losses to Pac and Floyd don't count against other fighters so they shouldn't count against Bradley.
Loss or draw he still didn't beat Provodnikov, the same Provodnikov that got his ass handed to him by Chris Algieri.
So the Chaves fight was controversial but the Provodnikov, and first Pacquaio weren't?
Bradley hasn't won a fight since 2013. He is 1-3-1 in his last 5 fights his last clear win via TKO was against 70 yr old Cassamayor back in 2011.
Just like Ward who hasn't fought in over a year and was taken off the list, someone (Bradley) who hasn't won a fight in almost 2 years should be taken off the list.Comment
-
You know what I believe it boils down to, is we are so much a creature of the action moment. I say "action" based off how most of his fights have ended. I understand Gonzalez has knocked out like 10 of 11, but his resume compared to everyone else on this pound for pound list is pretty pathetic.
The guys Gonzalez fights are largely Central American or Asian who are naturally smaller and don't get the same media profile as American or British fighters who are heavier.
To say the resume is pathetic in comparison is a very loose statement. Yesh the guys Froch has faced are better known names in the West but thats doesn't mean they are better fighters.Comment
-
I agree with the sentiment that if Kovalev isn't on the list, Canelo and Golovkin don't belong on their either.Comment
-
But do you say that because you don't know the guys at the lower weights? And maybe think that they are lesser fighters?
The guys Gonzalez fights are largely Central American or Asian who are naturally smaller and don't get the same media profile as American or British fighters who are heavier.
To say the resume is pathetic in comparison is a very loose statement. Yesh the guys Froch has faced are better known names in the West but thats doesn't mean they are better fighters.
As far as the Froch thing and "better fighters" statement, i believe if those fighters Gonzalez fought were better, they might have a better record.Comment
-
Froch probably has the best resume over the past 7 years. Faced 5 undefeated opponents and only loss to one who was number 2 pound for pound for a few years.Comment
-
GTFO, so Canelo is undefeated then?
Loss or draw he still didn't beat Provodnikov, the same Provodnikov that got his ass handed to him by Chris Algieri.
F- off ***, you the same person crying over Lara losing to Canelo.
So the Chaves fight was controversial but the Provodnikov, and first Pacquaio weren't?
Bradley hasn't won a fight since 2013. He is 1-3-1 in his last 5 fights his last clear win via TKO was against 70 yr old Cassamayor back in 2011.
Just like Ward who hasn't fought in over a year and was taken off the list, someone (Bradley) who hasn't won a fight in almost 2 years should be taken off the list.Comment
-
Bradley belongs on the list.Comment
-
Why is Canelo in there? Carl Froch had to do so much more than Canelo has to get into the top ten p4p. Carl Froch has had a tough resume and winning most all his fights, yet Canelo has got in on the basis of beating Trout and losing big to Floyd.Comment
Comment