Most Dangerous/Powerful Weight Classes By KO Percentage

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -Kev-
    this is boxing
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2006
    • 39914
    • 5,025
    • 1,447
    • 234,543

    #21
    For those curious about MW with all fighters numbers added:

    359 Wins, 214 KO's, 59%.

    Comment

    • daggum
      All time great
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 43418
      • 4,539
      • 3
      • 166,270

      #22
      ko percentage doesn't mean you can punch. calzaghe has a high ko percentage.

      Comment

      • glenn mcrory
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2014
        • 1784
        • 169
        • 106
        • 22,671

        #23
        So what is the best fghter part for?
        So you can drop your biased fantasy list on us?
        Hernandez lol Even if you believed that he was, no way is it concensus.
        Since this is about titlists, I wont rag on Danny too much. He is the best choice in a room full of drek.
        Roman and Estrada need to rematch before you go on deciding that. You seem eager to jump the gun there.

        Comment

        • ИATAS
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2007
          • 36648
          • 2,509
          • 1,953
          • 50,835

          #24
          Originally posted by glenn mcrory
          So what is the best fghter part for?
          So you can drop your biased fantasy list on us?
          Hernandez lol Even if you believed that he was, no way is it concensus.
          Since this is about titlists, I wont rag on Danny too much. He is the best choice in a room full of drek.
          Roman and Estrada need to rematch before you go on deciding that. You seem eager to jump the gun there.
          Right, that's why it's best to simply include the top ten. Too many variables here considering who is the best fighter.

          Comment

          • Citizen Koba
            Deplorable Peacenik
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2013
            • 20446
            • 3,944
            • 3,788
            • 2,875,273

            #25
            Originally posted by -Kev-
            Did it myself, took me 45 minutes.

            You see how there is data for just about everything in a sport like baseball? For example, what is a batter's average in the day time, and what is it in the night time. What is a teams winning % at home, what is it away.

            I feel like boxing does not have any reporters, commentators, journalists compiling this information for the fans. Statistical information about every aspect of the sport gives boxing more life. The best they do is talk about compubox and that's not enough IMO.
            Yeah - I agree that there could be more info out there. Boxstat.co is kinda cute and relatively new and I believe still quite incomplete but like most boxing databases focusses on individual achievements.



            Problem is Boxing is a sport that as a whole is it's not easy to apply valid statistical method over and between the varied weightclasses and the different frequencies with which guys fight. Fighters bounce up and down in weight for money fights or climb the weighclasses through their careers, they get injured or simply choose not to fight and that's even before the politics start....

            From a stats viewpoint boxing is entirely different to regular team sports with a annual scedule and high frequency of match-ups, or even other individual sports like say tennis with regular top level tournaments, so you gotta be especially wary with interpretation of boxing data. I mean - how do you use comparative stats in a sport in which, in most cases, oponents can be chosen by the likely winner ffs?

            Me, I just like watching the **** over a few drinks...I've got some stats background but I'll leave that to those more dedicated than myself.
            Last edited by Citizen Koba; 02-18-2015, 01:48 AM.

            Comment

            • joesaiditstrue
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2008
              • 5254
              • 480
              • 1,426
              • 13,590

              #26
              Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
              KO % depends on how many bums you fight.

              KO% should be based on opps with at least 15 wins and a win-loss record ratio no smaller than 3-2.


              Except your statement is true for every division . They all have bums getting sparked out by top 10 fighters.

              In the end the numbers don't lie because all other things are equal except weight.

              Comment

              • Left Hook Tua
                VATNIK
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2008
                • 62306
                • 7,010
                • 1,581
                • 951,318

                #27
                Originally posted by joesaiditstrue
                Except your statement is true for every division . They all have bums getting sparked out by top 10 fighters.

                In the end the numbers don't lie because all other things are equal except weight.
                numbers do lie, you buffoon.

                i don't even understand what you're trying to say.

                Comment

                • Left Hook Tua
                  VATNIK
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 62306
                  • 7,010
                  • 1,581
                  • 951,318

                  #28
                  Originally posted by daggum
                  ko percentage doesn't mean you can punch. calzaghe has a high ko percentage.
                  that's why all these stats are crap for most sports.

                  their nice sometimes but still worthless.

                  Comment

                  • Check_hooks
                    The Don of NSB
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Feb 2010
                    • 12099
                    • 966
                    • 1,875
                    • 25,959

                    #29
                    This is an interesting angle for sports betting

                    But I disagree with OP's "consensus pick" for WW and JWW

                    Comment

                    • Suckmedry
                      Banned
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 5558
                      • 321
                      • 201
                      • 7,267

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
                      it's welterweight imo.

                      most atg.

                      most hofers.

                      big enough to ****.

                      fast enough to catch you without you seeing.

                      also active enough. may not be 112/126 pace but doesn't slow in action like 160 and up fights.
                      Yeah, welterweight has always been my favourite weight class and i think a lot of other fans feel the same.

                      That said there is something irreplaceable about the drama of a HW bout with two true punchers. Its always a split second away from the end.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP