Better win: Mayweather over Canelo or Pacquiao over Bradley(2)?

[IMDAZED]

Read the thread title again. I said which win is better not who would win in a fight. Nice try on twisting it.

I read the thread title and answered the question. Try reading my post again.

[Wolfie*]

I read the thread title and answered the question. Try reading my post again.

You're insinutating just because Canelo most likely will beat Bradley because he's a bigger dude, it's a better win because he will win between the two which is dumb. You just said yourself Bradley has a better resume and therefore is a better win because he's accomplished more than Canelo. Bradley has better wins, better P4P status, and has bigger wins. How is Canelo a better win? Doesn't make sense.

[IMDAZED]

You're insinutating just because Canelo most likely will beat Bradley because he's a bigger dude, it's a better win because he will win between the two which is dumb. You just said yourself Bradley has a better resume and therefore is a better win because he's accomplished more than Canelo. Bradley has better wins, better P4P status, and has bigger wins. How is Canelo a better win? Doesn't make sense.

Just because you don't get it doesn't mean it doesn't make any sense. Rigo is more accomplished than Canelo. Would that have been a better win too?

[DARKSEID]

I think Canelo look drained. That's just the truth. He's been having trouble making 154.

[Wolfie*]

Just because you don't get it doesn't mean it doesn't make any sense. Rigo is more accomplished than Canelo. Would that have been a better win too?

Well duh, yes it's a better win if a fighter is at the weight class beating a high regarded P4P fighter who has a good resume. The fact that you don't see that makes me question your boxing knowledge. Anyone with a brain can see Bradley is a better win.

[sapaw]

Well duh, yes it's a better win if a fighter is at the weight class beating a high regarded P4P fighter who has a good resume. The fact that you don't see that makes me question your boxing knowledge. Anyone with a brain can see Bradley is a better win.

just read my sig, your debating with Floyd's loverboy so its useless!

[IMDAZED]

Well duh, yes it's a better win if a fighter is at the weight class beating a high regarded P4P fighter who has a good resume. The fact that you don't see that makes me question your boxing knowledge. Anyone with a brain can see Bradley is a better win.

Both Bradley and Canelo were world class. Let's not get carried away as if Canelo was some bum. In fact, most people on here said Mayweather was scared of him. Right up until the fight was signed. Both Canelo and Tim were considered elite except you and I know damn well that Canelo would've beat his ass. And that's that. What's funny to me is that 95% of people said the first fight was 11-1 Pacquiao or 10-2 so why would they turn around and say that beating him again (when you already whitewashed him supposedly) is some big win? No consistency whatsoever.

[Wolfie*]

Both Bradley and Canelo were world class. Let's not get carried away as if Canelo was some bum. In fact, most people on here said Mayweather was scared of him. Right up until the fight was signed. Both Canelo and Tim were considered elite except you and I know damn well that Canelo would've beat his ass. And that's that. What's funny to me is that 95% of people said the first fight was 11-1 Pacquiao or 10-2 so why would they turn around and say that beating him again (when you already whitewashed him supposedly) is some big win? No consistency whatsoever.

I never said Canelo was a bum. He's a good fighter and I've actually given his props on here. Dude, who cares about public opinion. It does affect how big of a win it can be. I'm dealing with what's record and who's accomplished what, not what some dumbass people were saying before canelo/mayweather. Bradley was established at 140, the best for that matter, moved up to 147 and grab some good wins. Even if you take off Pacquiao's win off his resume since that win is questioned, it doesn't take away from what Bradley accomplished at 140 and his win over JMM and Ruslan at 147. Canelo can't compete on his resume currently.

[PeasantCrusha]

I had Floyd whipping vicious hooks to Cotto's temples while he just stood there with his hands up like a doofy flat footed bum. Even wobbled that dumb ass and left red lumps on the sides of his head lol. ****** Cotto thinks that if he puts his hands on his face that no one can hit him lol.

Canelo walked Floyd down like a warrior. Come to think of it, easy 8-4 win for Canelo on pure ring generalship.


War Canelo!

[creekrat77]

Looking back I'd say they are about the same. Canelo has strengthened his resume with formidable opponents but honestly he is still the flat footed one dimensional fighter that fought Floyd. Honestly though Bradley is the better of the two, now that I think about it. Bradley has a lot of great wins against prime opponents, rightfully not including Marquez as prime. But he was still a top dog at Welterweight. Even though Bradley is the better win on paper, I think we all know styles make fights. And with that being said, an undefeated Canelo with the full support of Mexico behind him is probably harder for Floyd and Manny to beat then any Tim Bradley we have seen. I could be wrong about Tim though. He is so fearless and daring, I wouldn't be surprised if he could find a way to win against Floyd.