Originally posted by The Big Dunn
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who had the better overall career? Mike Tyson or Roy Jones Jr. And tell us why
Collapse
-
You asked which guy had the better overall career, not who was the better boxer. Tyson was one of the most significant figures in the world at his apex. Roy was the best p4p fighter. Both were considered unbeatable. Both made it to the top of their divisions. One guy transcended the sport.
Can you understand the difference in terms of careers?
Comment
-
Originally posted by stefl14 View PostWhat's with the Tyson worship? You find this sort of stuff amongst your average guy on the street who doesn't know **** about boxing but knows Tyson. On a boxing forum, however, I expect better. If we're talking legacy, Roy Jones is the much greater fighter - he wins this hands down. I know you can rip anybody's legacy apart, but ****ing hell the only prime great fighter Tyson beat was a former light heavyweight. We can talk all day about how Tyson wasn't motivated for Douglas etc, but the fact is he lost to him, and if he wasn't motivated or needed Kevin Rooney, that takes away from his greatness as a fighter. Tyson was a one trick pony - had great skills and athleticism but a **** mentality and if plan A didn't work then he didn't win.
With that being said....
You can close the thread now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostYou asked which guy had the better overall career, not who was the better boxer. Tyson was one of the most significant figures in the world at his apex. Roy was the best p4p fighter. Both were considered unbeatable. Both made it to the top of their divisions. One guy transcended the sport.
Can you understand the difference in terms of careers?
Comment
-
Jones had the better overall career. As did many fighters compared to Tyson.
Tyson wasn't anyone special in terms of "overall career." But at his best (87/88)...he was as good as it gets.
Comment
-
Comment
Comment