Can't see him losing to Margarito or Williams, though the Williams fight would be very difficult for Floyd. Martinez is just too big for Floyd, but there's no shame in admitting that Floyd would lose to top 5 P4P middleweight. Pacquiao would have and still would beat Floyd though, only I think the margin will be greater now as Floyd seems to be slowing down much faster than Pacman.
How many losses would Floyd have if he fought Margarito/Williams/Sergio/Pac?
Collapse
-
Not for nothing but someone else created this fantasy thread. If you think Floyd would lose to them, you get applause. If you think he'd beat them, you get referred to as a fanboy. What's the point of these threads if they're not even open for discussion?Comment
-
Judging from the way NSB posters analyzes things here.had Pac not fought Barrera, Dela Hoya, Hatton, Mosley, Margarito, Cotto, and Rios.all of them would have beaten Pac brutally or maybe just maybe Pac would not have gained all this hatred because he would never have been mentioned with the likes of Floyd
Comment
-
I get it, no matter what argument someone gives you'll try to come up with something to defend Floyd..love does that to you my man, I understand.. And I like a good debate but it's mostly impossible when blind love gets in the way.Comment
-
My thinking is backward but you're showing me a fight of a guy who fights nothing like Floyd and telling me that's how he would have fought him lol..
I get it, no matter what argument someone gives you'll try to come up with something to defend Floyd..love does that to you my man, I understand.. And I like a good debate but it's mostly impossible when blind love gets in the way.Comment
-
-
No he wont have losses, even if I imagine it, still in my imagination floyd will duck and run like a chicken from these beasts.
castillo and maidana not mentioned above caught the chicken and deep fried him already. What more can he have with killers above.Comment
-
I can understand who beats who if it is something like they are schedule to fight in a coming months or so, because both side will know who made the right prediction and who are far off.
But a who beats who thread that is never going to happen? it is never going to be proven who really made the right prediction/analysis and who did not. that's what I am pointing out.
In a discussion/debate/arguments both side presents their opinions, facts are laid out hoping in the end both side will come to a conclusion who's ideas, opinions, facts, prevail and who came out wrong.
This thread is a goner, poster A presents his facts. opinions, analysis. Poster B counters with his facts, opinions, analysis. both side don't want to budge in the end it goes round and round in circles like a dog chasing it's tail.
Fast forward 5 yrs after and they are still at it. It is never gonna endLast edited by Rath; 01-25-2015, 08:59 AM.Comment
Comment