Comments Thread For: CBS' Moonves: No Truth I Threatened SHO's Espinoza

[Spoon23]

Boycott both guys fights!

No, just your fighter called TBE. The nerve to be called that and he cant even accept the real challenge for all the money in the world. The world is clamoring for it and he ducks and weaves with outrageous excuses.

Can't even fight the fight fans want to see..

The guy is a conman. He ain't stepping in the ring coz his afraid to get his ass whooped simple as that. Not giving any penny o this ****.

Biggest purse in sports history. What does your **** idol do. Duck it.

[FloydvsPac]

Read again.

Read what, bro? Just specify one specific criticism in this reply, if you think there is one.

[IMDAZED]

Read what, bro? Just specify one specific criticism in this reply, if you think there is one.

There are many. I was disappointed in his decision to essentially waste his 2006 against the winner and loser of Judah-Baldomir, with much better fights on the table. Guerrero was a similar set-up and entirely unimpressive. I'm not a fan of his lifestyle either. We could go on but how childish is this, really? We are discussing the negotiations between Mayweather and Pacquiao. Tell me, how has he hurt the negotiation process with his actions?

[tredh]

who cares. its par for the course. Floyd doesnt deserve the benefit of the doubt.

Ever notice that every Manny interview has been a fluff piece? Dude hardly gets interrogated.

Why? Because he's a nice guy who treats people with respect and appears honest.

Its biased all right. But Deal with it.

Not directed at you in particular

But Arum does?

Why do people really believe Floyd or Arum is what I don't understand?

Arum's lies are all over the place

Floyd's lies are consistent

Bottomline is they are both known liars.

What makes one more believable than the other?

[Evol]

Not directed at you in particular

But Arum does?

Why do people really believe Floyd or Arum is what I don't understand?

Arum's lies are all over the place

Floyd's lies are consistent

Bottomline is they are both known liars.

What makes one more believable than the other?

yes they're both liars. but at this point arum lies to make the fight look better on his half. even if the fight is not even close to being done, arum is tricking everyone by saying he's been working with cbs/shotime, etc. and that manny has agreed to all of floyd's terms. this is something arum never said before. so if he's lying or not, this is actually making his side look good.

now with floyd, this dude comes out with a different reason every week. manny still have marquez/bradley problems, manny's ppv #'s is low, manny who? manny has a boss, manny has no say in who he fights next etc etc etc! i mean this all came AFTER floyd said he doesnt want khan and that he wants manny next. look how fast he did a 180 after saying that.

[Matisyahu]

Haven't read all the responses but the reason they twisted his words was because that was the subtitle for the TMZ article. Sloppiness. It seems to be an assumption on their part.

[Matisyahu]

Not directed at you in particular

But Arum does?

Why do people really believe Floyd or Arum is what I don't understand?

Arum's lies are all over the place

Floyd's lies are consistent

Bottomline is they are both known liars.

What makes one more believable than the other?

Because Pacquiao's side appears more determined to get it done. Even their determination is rebranded as desperation by Floyd's side which ought to raise some eyebrows. C'mon people. Manny is saying he's scared, he can beat him, that if he cares about the fans he'd sign on. What has Floyd saying? Just junk. If not a duck then he's simply not representing himself very well.

[davidandrei]

mayweather need to acknowledge pacquiao at least and do it with correct terminology.

instead of shut up pack-yow, you are not a boss. you have no say.

ok pacquiao, have a seat and wait. let the big boys negotiate. and id be like ooooohhh shots fired blah blah.

[Fetta]

mayweather need to acknowledge pacquiao at least and do it with correct terminology.

instead of shut up pack-yow, you are not a boss. you have no say.

ok pacquiao, have a seat and wait. let the big boys negotiate. and id be like ooooohhh shots fired blah blah.

Floyd saying Pac you have no say in anything is pretty much that.

Did you need him to be kind to Pac for you to be like ooooohhh shots fired blah blah

[davidandrei]

Floyd saying Pac you have no say in anything is pretty much that.

Did you need him to be kind to Pac for you to be like ooooohhh shots fired blah blah

I guess tone doesn't come out so well when written out. mayweather saying he have no say comes off like a kid, like shut up no you shut up no you. the way I prefer it to be said it has a grown up tone tellin his son he must wait and eat vegetables before he can eat candy. when Floyd talks, he has a defensive tone sometimes. I feel like as he grows older he has some pretty good responses but still sometimes revert to old ways.

in the past, will you fight pacquiao lead to all kinds of crazy responses.
after chino2, he just said pac gotta get past algieri then well talk. grown man ****.

also, im not saying either of them have to be civil or nice when they talk. just don't come off whiny. im sure you had a childhood. when teenagers say they gonna **** you up or whatever, and you just smile menacingly, plant feet, and say ok pop off > no man ill **** you up.