whats your take on fighters getting robbed of clear wins?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
According to compubox, Pacquiao landed more punches than Marquez. It shows that Marquez was not dominating that fight to get a win.
I know compubox was not 100% reliable but tv cameras don't show all angles in fights too.Comment
-
Lara beat Canelo... Period. I know a different set of rules applied to Lara in that fight and all of the sudden body/elbow shots were all of the sudden the standard in scoring fights ...
But let's be real ... An insanely popular Mexican fighter fought a Cuban fighter who couldn't match up... In terms of fans ... And fans only...
But the wrong hand got raised that night and it will always view that as a win for Lara.
^^^ now apply that to all the (real) robberies that we see and will continue to see in this sport... Just follow the money...Comment
-
I strongly disagree man, really neither fighter did anything in that fight. The way Lara fought was a disgrace, 2 minutes of moving laterally and the occasional 1-2 is not enough to win a fight. It was not a robbery, at best it was a 7-5 win for him and that's really pushing it.Lara beat Canelo... Period. I know a different set of rules applied to Lara in that fight and all of the sudden body/elbow shots were all of the sudden the standard in scoring fights ...
But let's be real ... An insanely popular Mexican fighter fought a Cuban fighter who couldn't match up... In terms of fans ... And fans only...
But the wrong hand got raised that night and it will always view that as a win for Lara.
^^^ now apply that to all the (real) robberies that we see and will continue to see in this sport... Just follow the money...Comment
-
Fine. But a hand needs to get raised and there is just no way a non biased person could really score that in Canelo's favor. I don't even think you could come up with a draw.I strongly disagree man, really neither fighter did anything in that fight. The way Lara fought was a disgrace, 2 minutes of moving laterally and the occasional 1-2 is not enough to win a fight. It was not a robbery, at best it was a 7-5 win for him and that's really pushing it.
I was highly upset with Lara's performance and highly critical of it and while I won't say he deserved to lose based on it ... I feel like he knew what the stakes were and he had every opportunity to pull the trigger and he **** the bed.
That being said ... It wasn't a master class but it really was pretty clean cut. I land 2 or 3 clean punches you miss 4 or 5 hard punches ... I win the round.
The rounds Canelo won (2) were the most dominant of the fight,I'll give him that, but outside of those rounds ... He lost.Comment
-
I get what you're saying that Lara moved a lot, but let's be real: why couldn't Canelo just cut off the ring? Angulo did it; why couldn't Nelo?I strongly disagree man, really neither fighter did anything in that fight. The way Lara fought was a disgrace, 2 minutes of moving laterally and the occasional 1-2 is not enough to win a fight. It was not a robbery, at best it was a 7-5 win for him and that's really pushing it.
Lara lost that fight more than Canelo won it, if that makes sense. Lara actually did land 10 more punches than Canelo.Comment
-
Because he's not very good lol I remember when he fought Alfonso Gomez a few years ago and in a few rounds gomez schooled him in close quarters and made him look really bad. Prior to that fight I thought canelo was the next big thing but after that I realized he wasn't anything special and his performances since then indicate that. Anyway, that fight with Lara was just brutal.Comment
-
In most fights those 10 punches wouldn't count but in a fight where Canelo didn't land much more than 10 punches to the head TOTAL they make a difference as funny as it sounds ...Comment
Comment