don't know why people still bother with this when mayweather is generally known as a roider. all you have to do is, "GOOGLE!" like floyd is fond of screaming.
kind of inherently implies others are at fault. There's no need to be redundant and say it was kind of our fault and kind of floyds since everyone knows who the other party already was. This is often done in language to save time. Whats not done often is throwing in words like kind of because kind of inherently changes the nature and meaning of your sentence. If he wanted to add new information he would have said it was kind of our fault and kind of daggum's fault(daggum being the new information). But since we already know he's talking about floyd there's no need to be redundant. Linguistics study it!
And if you are going to criticise, let's not open a big bag of worms by talking about Miguel Cotto. Cotto hasn't done random drug testing since he fought Floyd. That's a fact. And I like Cotto.
All I'm doing is holding Floyd accountable to the same standards you guys should. He knows the testing period as much as Manny does, there is no difference. I think both of them are clean as in that they are doing what is within in the rules, that technically wouldn't be cheating. The only person I know is for sure doped like a 90's-2000's MLB player is JMM. Other than him I'm pretty sure most of them were on Testostorone but within the "allowed" limit. In Nevada it was something like 4 or 6 to 1. Everyone is doping, but only up to the maximum amount. I even think Cotto wasn't until he got with Roach and if you don't test dirty, you're probably clean. But like I said, JMM doesn't get the benefit of the doubt.
Seeing as how he wanted to know when two of those 3 tests were to be administered, and also wanted a 30 day cutoff, yes it would be easy for him to roid.
I put cuz they can even give you a college english course on the word "KINDA", and you are so adamant that its more like "DEFINITE" LMAO
Yes because "kinda" is a word.
Funny how things are taken so literally. The guy is so obviously saying they're at fault for the first one (common sense) yet you're scrambling over choice of words despite the obvious implications to try and feed your denial.
Are you kidding? This is just another example of how you expose your ignorance about the drug matter. IMDAZED is completely right about NSAC's testing. It is not random and it is not that stringent. They do just a couple tests and that's it. And they don't even test for everything.
Today though, NSAC has an advanced random drug testing model that is practically identical to what USADA and VADA does. But it's only used if a Promoter is willing to pay for it. So far, Top Rank has used it for Pacquaio's recents fights in Nevada.
No where in the quote does he imply it was anything but their fault the first time round.
Embarrassing you're latching onto that word
so you believe everything honest freddie says. or just some quote that conveniently out of context in the whole interview.
you must also believe that floyd is afraid of manny because freddie has also said that.
the dontaenation interview in context "it is kind of our fault that the fight didnt happen because when we offered 2 weeks cut-off as we are negotiating floyd walk away from negotiation"
combining "it is kinda our fault" and "floyd is afraid" if you believe one interview you should believe other interviews> "its kinda our fault because we know floyd is afraid and we had given him an alibi to walk away"
Comment