Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Potential PPVs for 2015
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostAnd what was that? Do you really think casual fans will spend $70 to see if Mayweather can counter-punch Golovkin's pressure? Most of them don't even know what the *** that even means....lol people will pay for Mayweather-Pacquiao because of who they are and their name value. Do you think casuals pay for Mayweather fights because of his style of boxing? Lol..
.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Philantro View PostRead the whole thread and you will understand.
.
GGG vs floyd will not I REPEAT NOT do 3mil plus PPV. From that moment forward this became a thread I "skimmed" through.
Plus what's up with the range of PPV for Mayweather provodnikov? 800k to 1.8 mil. You barely left yourself any room for error on that one
Alast, for the sake of argument I will go read the OP in its entirety
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by -MEGA- View PostWtf, The whole thread or just the OP?
GGG vs floyd will not I REPEAT NOT do 3mil plus PPV. From that moment forward this became a thread I "skimmed" through.
Plus what's up with the range of PPV for Mayweather provodnikov? 800k to 1.8 mil. You barely left yourself any room for error on that one
Alast, for the sake of argument I will go read the OP in its entirety
.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Philantro View PostIn 2015 it will make over 1.5 million PPVs, if it had been done last year it would have been lower.
The reason Floyd hasn't fought GGG so far is that he has been avoiding the best in form fighters since 2007.
Do you mean that if GGG-Mayweather was made you wouldn't watch it? ...or do you know anyone interested in sports that wouldn't watch it? ...ask them.
.
However I recognize that I'm in the minority on this. I have many friends who are big time sports fans. None of them know much about boxing. I could show them a picture of GGG and they would have no idea who the hell he is. And these are huge sports fans.
I like your enthusiasm but your numbers are delusional.
Comment
Comment