Comments Thread For: Deontay Wilder Dismisses Michael Grant Comparison

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Deontay Wilder Dismisses Michael Grant Comparison

    When asked on a recent conference call if he sees any similarities between him and another 6-foot-7 heavyweight who got exposed it what turned out to be his only title shot, Wilder politely dismissed comparisons to Michael Grant. Lennox Lewis overwhelmed Grant, dropped him three times and knocked him out in the second round of their April 2000 heavyweight championship match at Madison Square Garden.

    [Click Here To Read More]
  • Slowhand
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2012
    • 1830
    • 470
    • 3,473
    • 22,610

    #2
    Well.. Wilder just might beat Stiverne, but Wlad vs Wilder would be exactly like Lewis vs Grant.

    Comment

    • - Ram Raid -
      Capricorn # 1
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2011
      • 1970
      • 202
      • 449
      • 9,007

      #3
      Unless my memory deceives me Grant was a far better boxer. Not that Wilder has to be on par skill wise 'cause their isn't a heavyweight out there right now that is anywhere as good as Lennox was.

      Comment

      • SeekDaGreat
        Da' Hood Legend
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2013
        • 9393
        • 341
        • 1,105
        • 19,147

        #4
        Lol. Beyonce Wilder couldn't even shine Michael Grants shoes. Grant would have KOd Wilder.

        He got TKOd by Zelenoff FFS.

        Comment

        • BritJimbo
          Interim Champion
          • Oct 2012
          • 652
          • 249
          • 194
          • 6,444

          #5
          Grant

          Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP
          When asked on a recent conference call if he sees any similarities between him and another 6-foot-7 heavyweight who got exposed it what turned out to be his only title shot, Wilder politely dismissed comparisons to Michael Grant. Lennox Lewis overwhelmed Grant, dropped him three times and knocked him out in the second round of their April 2000 heavyweight championship match at Madison Square Garden.

          [Click Here To Read More]
          I know he doesn't have a whole lotta credibility now, but at least
          Grant beat Golota and Obed Sullivan (better than a journeyman at the time)...People were picking Grant, whether they want to admit it now or not

          Comment

          • ////
            ////
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Sep 2014
            • 14948
            • 952
            • 671
            • 111,577

            #6
            Being big has become a basic requirement in the HW division but it's not enough on its own. So far we know Wilder is big but not a whole lot else.

            Comment

            • Boxing lives
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jun 2012
              • 2306
              • 106
              • 26
              • 22,861

              #7
              is stiverne as good a win as golota? that is the real question here

              Comment

              • BostonGuy
                Emeritus Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 13343
                • 2,119
                • 6,833
                • 900,690,265

                #8
                Jury's still out on Wilder but we should see how good or bad he is, when he faces Stiverne later this month. Wilder has a lot of things going for him that people don't give him credit for. Wilder has the 'killer instinct' that many fighters lack, including Michael Grant. When I watch Wilder, he looks like a young bad a$$ George Foreman who wanted to put a hurtin' on ya.

                Comment

                • NachoMan
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Nov 2007
                  • 5644
                  • 881
                  • 799
                  • 66,454

                  #9
                  Originally posted by - Ram Raid -
                  Unless my memory deceives me Grant was a far better boxer. Not that Wilder has to be on par skill wise 'cause their isn't a heavyweight out there right now that is anywhere as good as Lennox was.
                  Yes, your memory is shot. Grant was AWFUL. No skills, no balance. Nice guy, but an awful fighter. Wilder isn't any better skillwise, but he is in no way an inferior boxer because Grant's boxing skills were a zero.

                  Comment

                  • NachoMan
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Nov 2007
                    • 5644
                    • 881
                    • 799
                    • 66,454

                    #10
                    Originally posted by 80sFighter
                    Being big has become a basic requirement in the HW division but it's not enough on its own. So far we know Wilder is big but not a whole lot else.
                    Size has been plenty enough for Wlad. If he was 6'1" and 220lbs he would have been retired ten years ago. Fact.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP