Originally posted by SonOfCuba
View Post
As for there amateur careers..... They share a common opponent, Sultonov. Rigondeaux beat him 27-13 at the 2004 Olympics, four years later Lomachenko fought him at Beijing and won 13-1, knocking him down in the last round & Sultonov rates Lomachenko as the better fighter!
Rigo had 12 losses and Lomachenko had 1.. & so on!
You don't have to be all flash to be a great fighter. Ability to occupy space, use angles, fight with maximum efficiency, pace a fight, trigger opponents, test their weaknesses - Lomachenko possesses it all, and more.
Its a close call but IMO Loma is the greater amateur & will be a greater pro over time, plus Lomachenko also has a Val Barker trophy which Rigo never won!
Salildo LOL Go watch Rigondeaux get dropped & struggle to a SD over a far worse fighter (former Flyweight Cordoba) in his 7th fight .. Salido was a WW who needed dirty boxing & corrupt refereeing to win a SD over this 1-0 kid! Its Salido you should be criticising & Lomachenko you should be applauding for not lowering his art to a stinkfest & refusing to 'no mas' the endless low blows & ridiculous leniency of the ****** referee!
Comment