Was Bradley robbed yesterday?

**badnewsbrown** · 12-14-2014, 04:21 PM

Arum wanted to add another name that he can mix and match.

**ИATAS** · 12-14-2014, 04:22 PM

I thought it was a very bad decision. I wouldn't use the word robbery however.

**Boxing1836** · 12-14-2014, 04:23 PM

bradley clearly won and it wasn't a hard fight to score

**joseph5620** · 12-14-2014, 04:25 PM

Originally posted by Pechorin

I don't think so. Yesterday, going straight off user's comments on here, I thought Bradley had been ****ed by Arum. After watching the fight earlier today, ****, I think Bradley could have lost fairly as well.

Some of you guys are very impressionable and are easily swayed by commentators like Kellerman. Also, Bradley indiscriminately hops around and moves his upper body from side to side and some of you guys are like �Omfg! Bradley is a master boxer.�

This fight was very even to me. ****, I already forgot which ones, but I had Bradley winning three rounds decisively, while Chaves winning two. The rest of the rounds could have gone to either of them.

Bradley wasn't robbed yesterday, it could have gone either way. I personally think the draw was reasonable.

**Disclaimer* I'm aware there's new rules on this site, if I break any with this post, please don't ban me, I have yet to read them.

Yes he was. But there are so many people that resent and dislike him that they won't admit it. A bad decision is a robbery.

**bojangles1987** · 12-14-2014, 04:26 PM

Yes, clearly. I didn't listen to the commentators.

**jas** · 12-14-2014, 04:28 PM

i watched it on mute

had it for bradley clearly

**Strategic1** · 12-14-2014, 04:37 PM

It was clear.that Bradley was shutting him out. He did whatever he wanted to do and clearly got the best out of the exchanges.

Then around round 5 or 6... His eyes started to swell up and got worse and worse as the fight went on.

He either got fatigued or he was blind in the eye. I think it was the swollen eye that caused the fight to be closer that it was.

Bradley was on his way to a 11-1 , 10-2 win.

8-4 Bradley. 7-5 IF you give every close round to Chaves. Draw was a stretch and that Julie Lederman score was awful.

**The Hammer** · 12-14-2014, 04:38 PM

Originally posted by Pechorin

I don't think so. Yesterday, going straight off user's comments on here, I thought Bradley had been ****ed by Arum. After watching the fight earlier today, ****, I think Bradley could have lost fairly as well.

Some of you guys are very impressionable and are easily swayed by commentators like Kellerman. Also, Bradley indiscriminately hops around and moves his upper body from side to side and some of you guys are like �Omfg! Bradley is a master boxer.�

This fight was very even to me. ****, I already forgot which ones, but I had Bradley winning three rounds decisively, while Chaves winning two. The rest of the rounds could have gone to either of them.

Bradley wasn't robbed yesterday, it could have gone either way. I personally think the draw was reasonable.

**Disclaimer* I'm aware there's new rules on this site, if I break any with this post, please don't ban me, I have yet to read them.

You are 100% correct.

It was a close fight, not a robbery. The draw is a fair score.

Max Kellerman loves Bradley and his very biased comments were an indication of that.

**mathed** · 12-14-2014, 04:41 PM

Pretty clear cut winner to me.........Lederman either had too many drinks pre-fight or a fat check from Arum in her pocket.

Punch stats

Bradley:
Total Punches - 225/572(39%)
Power Shots - 146/343 (43%)
Landed Head Shots - 122
Landed Body Shots - 103

Chaves
Total Punches - 152/570 (27%)
Power Shots - 108/323 (33%)
Landed Head Shots - 94
Landed Body Shots - 58

Was Bradley robbed yesterday?