Bradley beats Khan any day of the week.

[Box-Office]

Wha,you believe khan to be better then pac or Marquez. Wow..

You justify that it wasn't ducking because Bradley fought Marquez or Pacquiao later on, who are better than Khan, but how in the world that changes he ducked Khan when it matters? Khan could've been fighting Brook in December for the IBF title, but that wouldn't have changed he ducked Alexander last year.

You want to call it a smart financial decision, but also have trouble admitting it was done only because he ducked Khan. You want to have it both ways.

Thing is Bradley made a financial decision that paid off (later) unlike Stevenson. However, it was achieved through ducking Khan.

[-MEGA-]

You justify that it wasn't ducking because Bradley fought Marquez or Pacquiao later on, who are better than Khan, but how in the world that changes he ducked Khan when it matters? Khan could've been fighting Brook in December for the IBF title, but that wouldn't have changed he ducked Alexander last year.

You want to call it a smart financial decision, but also have trouble admitting it was done only because he ducked Khan. You want to have it both ways.

Thing is Bradley made a financial decision that paid off (later) unlike Stevenson. However, it was achieved through ducking Khan.

Even if it was "down the line" Bradley had to align himself with the people who could get him the fights he wanted (top rank) Plus I think he was paying his "then promoter" like 30-40 percent of his purses. It was time to make the move, he had the opportunity and he took it. I'm sure a Khan fight wasn't even a part of the thought process.

[Box-Office]

And you can protect your "p4p" status by avoiding your greatest threats.

/end thread

Bradley AND Marquez

They were basically fighting to see who is the ****tier ducker between the two. The loser should've been stipulated to be fed to King Khan in a steel cage barbed wire Hell in a Cell match with Saj as the guest referee.

[Rome-By-Ko]

again. Get Ahold of yourself man.

It was the same scenario. You could flavor it up all you want. But it was for the same purpose the "sweepstakes"


THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS Bradley made the right decision and Khan,,, well you know the story.

I agree,and btw I did not even feel Khan ducked Alexander..He made the logical decision and the best decision for his career..

[-MEGA-]

I agree,and btw I did not even feel Khan ducked Alexander..He made the logical decision and the best decision for his career..

I didn't think he did either.

[FlatLine]

again. Get Ahold of yourself man.

It was the same scenario. You could flavor it up all you want. But it was for the same purpose the "sweepstakes"


THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS Bradley made the right decision and Khan,,, well you know the story.

It wasn't the same scenario at all. Khan had Mayweather interest on the table in negotiations, the media were reporting about a possible Khan vs Mayweather fight next so Khan wanted to try to secure it.

Bradley was just talking about fights he wanted to get down the line with Floyd and Pacquiao but there were no fights in negotiations or on the table other than the fight with Khan, which he ducked.

Totally different, so you're just trolling now.

[Rome-By-Ko]

You justify that it wasn't ducking because Bradley fought Marquez or Pacquiao later on, who are better than Khan, but how in the world that changes he ducked Khan when it matters? Khan could've been fighting Brook in December for the IBF title, but that wouldn't have changed he ducked Alexander last year.

You want to call it a smart financial decision, but also have trouble admitting it was done only because he ducked Khan. You want to have it both ways.

Thing is Bradley made a financial decision that paid off (later) unlike Stevenson. However, it was achieved through ducking Khan.

Sorry I just can't see it that way..The same way I do not feel Khan ducked Alexander..There was a chance at Mayweather,he had to take it..

[Box-Office]

Even if it was "down the line" Bradley had to align himself with the people who could get him the fights he wanted (top rank) Plus I think he was paying his "then promoter" like 30-40 percent of his purses. It was time to make the move, he had the opportunity and he took it. I'm sure a Khan fight wasn't even a part of the thought process.

Look I get it, Bradley made a financial decision for the best of his family. I can respect that, because having been in there as an amateur, I can only imagine the sacrifices as a pro, BUT that in no way in hell changes he ducked Khan to get there. That's the focal point.

Khan fight WAS in the thought process. Something like: What if i lose? has been uttered by Bradley. It has been talked about in this thread in detail, so if you look through you'll find it, I don't feel like dabbling in it again.

[Box-Office]

Sorry I just can't see it that way..The same way I do not feel Khan ducked Alexander..There was a chance at Mayweather,he had to take it..

Khan did duck Alexander to maximize his chances of a Mayweather fight. It backfired, so that's another story. I've admitted to that way before this fight was signed, so it's not like I'm being morally sound because Khan is finally fighting him.

Ducking doesn't necessarily mean scared to **** "OMG he is going to KO me" like GGG or Kovalev type guys. It also means a fighter who can beat you by decision.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Look I get it, Bradley made a financial decision for the best of his family. I can respect that, because having been in there as an amateur, I can only imagine the sacrifices as a pro, BUT that in no way in hell changes he ducked Khan to get there. That's the focal point.

Khan fight WAS in the thought process. Something like: What if i lose? has been uttered by Bradley. It has been talked about in this thread in detail, so if you look through you'll find it, I don't feel like dabbling in it again.

I don't mind dabbling into to be honest..Esp looking at both fighters career,and my thoughts on both of them..Cause contrary to popular believe,I'm a Khan fan and know his career very well..