Bradley beats Khan any day of the week.

[jas]

What was the context of "What if I lose to Khan?"

it will limit his potential earning power..

[Dirk Diggler UK]

it will limit his potential earning power..

Well obviously. Getting his ass kicked by Khan would have sent him back to ESPN

[IronDanHamza]

it will limit his potential earning power..

Right, so he avoided him incase he lost thus reduced his earning potential?

[jas]

Right, so he avoided him incase he lost thus reduced his earning potential?

yea, same reason floyd avoided pacquaio, not to turn this into another floyd pac thread but just giving the example

but if you ask bradley now thats hes made a lot of money whether he will fight khan, he would....he will fight anybody, he wants to go up to 154 to fight cotto or canelo for crying out loud and he is known as a relatively light puncher

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-L5IT_9AsoE

[IronDanHamza]

yea, same reason floyd avoided pacquaio, not to turn this into another floyd pac thread but just giving the example

but if you ask bradley now thats hes made a lot of money whether he will fight khan, he would....he will fight anybody, he wants to go up to 154 to fight cotto or canelo for crying out loud and he is known as a relatively light puncher



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-L5IT_9AsoE

Example makes no sense.

Bradley literally said "What if I lose?" And we're talking about context? What possible context can it be said in that isn't an obvious duck?

[jas]

Example makes no sense.

Bradley literally said "What if I lose?" And we're talking about context? What possible context can it be said in that isn't an obvious duck?

bradley will fight khan now, thats my point......

[IronDanHamza]

bradley will fight khan now, thats my point......

What's the point there though?

Fact is he ducked Khan blatantly and it's being attempted to be denied (miserably)

[-MEGA-]

What was the context of "What if I lose to Khan?"

Iirc he was speaking from a business prospective and not a fighter prospective and he used it in the context of a hypothesis.


It's pretty much the same as when khan ducked devon. Just because he's fighting him now doesn't mean he didn't try to duck him.




The bottom line is: so what if you think Bradley ducked Khan. He went on to bigger and better things and has proven to be the better fighter of the two without even stepping foot in the ring with him.






God, I hope this fight happens someday.

[IronDanHamza]

Iirc he was speaking from a business prospective and not a fighter prospective and he used it in the context of a hypothesis.


It's pretty much the same as when khan ducked devon. Just because he's fighting him now doesn't mean he didn't try to duck him.




The bottom line is: so what if you think Bradley ducked Khan. He went on to bigger and better things and has proven to be the better fighter of the two without even stepping foot in the ring with him.






God, I hope this fight happens someday.

Ok, so you've just admitted that Bradley ducked Khan.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Ok, so you've just admitted that Bradley ducked Khan.

Why do they bother dancing around in circles? Bojangles is the only Bradley fan with any sense.