Comments Thread For: Saunders Grabs Split Nod, Defeats Chris Eubank Jr.

[FelipeB]

Saunders did not even throw his left had nor did he work the body .. Eubank looked sloppy at time but I still had him clearly winning ..

[gmc_rfc_06]

I thought it was a draw.

Saunders controlled the first half of the fight with a jab, but Eubank got aggressive and took over the 2nd half. I gave Eubank all but one round from 6-12 while Saunders won most of the first 6...if anything I'd have said Eubank edged it.

[xSWEET_SCIENCEx]

Close fight but NO WAY did Eubank win.

[Spacey1991]

Lol didnt this guys dad just say he could beat Golovkin? LOL

I ****ing hope not!

Golovkin would tear him a new one!

[Ham Porter]

Eubank looked woeful from a technical point of view. His balance was poor, his jab was lacking and he was very limited offensively, but he handled Saunders more comfortably in that second half than Saunders handled him in the first half.

I suspect this will be like DeGale-Groves in the future, where most of the people who initially thought the decision was right gradually change opinions overtime.

[Hype job]

I thought it was a draw.

Saunders controlled the first half of the fight with a jab, but Eubank got aggressive and took over the 2nd half. I gave Eubank all but one round from 6-12 while Saunders won most of the first 6...if anything I'd have said Eubank edged it.

Your bumhole is sore.

[Tedkidlewis]

I had Eubank winning but it was a close fight. I think too much emphasis is being put on Eubank looking sloppy in the first four rounds. Eubank Jnr did enough pressing and landing bigger shots for me mid way to late in the fight.

[paulf]

That fight was NOT close. Eubank is ****.

[LacedUp]

I thought it was a draw.

5-1 to BJS in after the first six. 5-1 to Eubank after the second six.

[Hype job]

I thought it was a draw.

5-1 to BJS in after the first six. 5-1 to Eubank after the second six.

**** off you ****ing gay ass arselicker!