Comments Thread For: Amir Khan: I Believe I Can Shine Against Devon Alexander

[Lullaby]

It must be difficult to enjoy something you don't get!

Explain then?

[alexguiness]

I'm not, you can't call a obvious blatant robbery as a loss, no matter its on the record or not, according to your logic Bradley beat Pacquiao in the first fight?

Sadly logic is not a factor when judges score fights.

Neither is logic present in any of your posts about Khan.

[Lullaby]

Sadly logic is not a factor when judges score fights.

Neither is logic present in any of your posts about Khan.

So judges can't score the fights wrong according to your logic? lol, i'm done with you.

[alexguiness]

did I say anything wrong? or something which is not factual?

No, not at all.

You just said that Khan's performances against Molina and Collazo put him on the same level as Floyd and Manny.

That's your opinion.

It is all subjective so facts don't really matter here.

[Lullaby]

No, not at all.

You just said that Khan's performances against Molina and Collazo put him on the same level as Floyd and Manny.

That's your opinion.

It is all subjective so facts don't really matter here.

I didn't say that lol, I just said he looked good in 2 of his 3 last fights, you were trying to make it look like he struggled in all 3, maybe I should've explained a bit more.

[tredh]

Just testing

[alexguiness]

So judges can't score the fights wrong according to your logic? lol, i'm done with you.

Judges score fights based on a subjective interpretation of what they observe.

Logical reasoning is not an essential part of boxing.

The judges scorecards are absolute - unless deemed flawed / corrupted post fight by the appropriate commission.

That is how Khan (and Manny) lost fights they may have 'won' otherwise.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

You just can't use beating Collazo as a benchmark for Khan's 'greatness'.

I really thought that Collazo would give Khan some problems, maybe even get a decision. But as soon as the fight started you could see that he was past his best.

Fair play, Khan did want he needed to do to win the fight but I think that Collazo was just glad to be in Vegas and get paid.

What have you seen in Khan's last 3 fights to suggest that he is on par with Floyd or Manny?

You mean as soon as Khan dominated him, you had to quickly come up with an excuse for that?

[alexguiness]

You mean as soon as Khan dominated him, you had to quickly come up with an excuse for that?

I'm not making excuses for Collazo.

Khan won the fight, he did what he had to do.

Like I said, I was more disappointed in Collazo than I was impressed with Khan.

If you think Khan's performance against Collazo was pure boxing ****, then so be it.

I don't agree, that's all.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I'm not making excuses for Collazo.

Khan won the fight, he did what he had to do.

Like I said, I was more disappointed in Collazo than I was impressed with Khan.

If you think Khan's performance against Collazo was pure boxing ****, then so be it.

I don't agree, that's all.

Yes we know, you had a built-in excuse. And if Collazo won, it'd be a huge bonus for you.

How could you think Collazo could win a decision? Khan is so much faster and sharper and more active. I said he'd look great in the fight against that style as long as he didn't get caught with anything ******. And so it occurred. Collazo could do nothing with Khan.