Comments Thread For: Carl Froch: Damn Right I'm Ready To Retire!

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Did he actually say this?

That is irrelevant to this thread

It's relevant in showing that you're a tard whose opinion shouldn't be taken seriously.

[King_]

Just about every fighter he fought in the last 8-10 years except Mack was a good fighter at the time or considered a big threat. He beat a few and they fell off, it happens.
Abraham was meant to kill him, Bute was going to K.O him he was the underdog for these. Groves was given a great shot and in the rematch. Most experts was saying they was too fast, too skilled etc and he proved them wrong now you're looking back and dismissing his wins against world class fighters at the time for most part that was supposed to beat easily.

Also are you only saying Pascal is good because Kovalev might be fighting him next?

If Carl Froch has a weak resume then just about every fighter in the sport does.

No.. no, no. I'm not saying he has a weak resume! Froch has a great resume because he beat the top fighters in his division.


What I'm saying is HE is overrated BECAUSE of his resume. Because his division was weak and while he did indeed beat the top fighters of his division.... how good were they? Minus Bute, Pascal and Dirrell..... how good are Abraham, Kessler, etc, anyway? (Kessler's only notable win is Froch, which is part of my point)

He gets overrated because he beat the best, but the best wasn't really that good, IMO, and then when you actually look at him from a talent perspective... How good is he really? Ring IQ-Stamina-Chin are his best "skills"

[IMDAZED]

I admitted he had a couple nice wins. I'm not trying to take anything away from his career and what he accomplished.... I just think he's an overrated fighter. In my personal opinion

He's a three-time champ with wins over top smw's and lhw's. No one is declaring him God but he deserves plenty of credit.

[IMDAZED]

He was rated as a top SMW. By everyone and by rankings.


What I'm saying is that's why all these wins by these guys are so "great." Cause they were against top fighters. But no one ever thought about what these fighters did well and if they were actually special fighters.


They all fought each other and made it to the top of the division- but Kessler, for example has no notable wins besides Carl Froch.


He's not a special fighter. The guys I'm talking about aren't special fighters and were fortunate to be in a terrible divison.


That is what I am saying.

So let me get this straight. You don't think Kessler was a top SMW in his prime?

[BattlingNelson]

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=657923





Literally right in between Mayweather and Rigo

I guess the relevance of his posts sort of .... hmmm .... diminished right there lol.

[Roy Jones Jnr]

It's relevant in showing that you're a tard whose opinion shouldn't be taken seriously.

......

[King_]

It's relevant in showing that you're a tard whose opinion shouldn't be taken seriously.

Lol. You've been on this site for this long and you can't realize I was just joking about the Murray thing?


Come on Dirk

[BattlingNelson]

So let me get this straight. You don't think Kessler was a top SMW in his prime?

Kessler was a top 3 SMW for 10 years. If somebody says he was the best SMW in that period, then they'd overrate him, but I haven't seen anybody making that claim at all. Maybe King has?

[Dean_Razorback]

i really enjoyed the beating he put on bute, that was fantastic.

[Roy Jones Jnr]

Lol. You've been on this site for this long and you can't realize I was just joking about the Murray thing?


Come on Dirk