This marks the 12th time Bhop has faced an undefeated fighter. What about the rest?

[jas]

Not surprised one bit by fraud jr's number

Truly amazing by bhop

[The Gambler1981]

Does undefeated mean something now? Last I recalled the general consensus here is being undefeated pretty much means you ain't **** and have never been tested


B-hop is a stud though

[IronDanHamza]

Not surprised one bit by fraud jr's number

Truly amazing by bhop

In 200 fights, Sugar Fraud Robinson fought one undefeated fighter.

Does that fail to suprise you aswell?

[jas]

In 200 fights, Sugar Fraud Robinson fought one undefeated fighter.

Does that fail to suprise you aswell?

Different era dan

Losses were common back then.

[IronDanHamza]

Different era dan

Losses were common back then.

Oh yes of course how could I forget.

Let's look at the modern era.

Sugar Fraud Leonard fought 3.

Does that also fail to suprise you?

[jas]

Oh yes of course how could I forget.

Let's look at the modern era.

Sugar Fraud Leonard fought 3.

Does that also fail to suprise you?

thats a different era also

some fighters fought more often

as reflected by the fact that duran had over 100 fights for example

[IronDanHamza]

thats a different era also

some fighters fought more often

as reflected by the fact that duran had over 100 fights for example

Different era he fought from 80-90's that's modern era.

So what beating undefeated only matters when? 2000 onward? Take Hopkins away then because some of his were in the 90's.

What does it matter than some fighters fought more often? Leonard had 40 odd fights and only fought 3 undefeated fighters what a fraud.

Billy Joe Sauders at 25 years of has fought 4 undefeated fighters and is fighting another one this month.

Billy Joe Saunders >>>>> Mayweather, Leonard and Robinson.

[Fists_of_Fury]

Different era he fought from 80-90's that's modern era.

So what beating undefeated only matters when? 2000 onward? Take Hopkins away then because some of his were in the 90's.

What does it matter than some fighters fought more often? Leonard had 40 odd fights and only fought 3 undefeated fighters what a fraud.

Billy Joe Sauders at 25 years of has fought 4 undefeated fighters and is fighting another one this month.

Billy Joe Saunders >>>>> Mayweather, Leonard and Robinson.

IronDan :

[ИATAS]

IronDan :

Different era he fought from 80-90's that's modern era.

So what beating undefeated only matters when? 2000 onward? Take Hopkins away then because some of his were in the 90's.

What does it matter than some fighters fought more often? Leonard had 40 odd fights and only fought 3 undefeated fighters what a fraud.

Billy Joe Sauders at 25 years of has fought 4 undefeated fighters and is fighting another one this month.

Billy Joe Saunders >>>>> Mayweather, Leonard and Robinson.

This thread isn't intended at all to suggest one thing or another, simply an interesting stat I discovered. I'm sure if you wanted to dig deeper into the stat to make it more interesting is out of all the undefeated fighters which were champs, former champs, future champs, etc. Or you could say, at post 40 years old Hopkins has fought four undefeated champs.

[IronDanHamza]

This thread isn't intended at all to suggest one thing or another, simply an interesting stat I discovered. I'm sure if you wanted to dig deeper into the stat to make it more interesting is out of all the undefeated fighters which were champs, former champs, future champs, etc. Or you could say, at post 40 years old Hopkins has fought four undefeated champs.

I don't dispute that my friend it's a good thread I was just responding to people who act like it's something that matters.

They are interesting stats.

For example Martinez has fought 7 undefeated fighters 4 of which in world title fights but none are overly good fighters.

On paper that's more than Marquez.

Khan like you posted has fought 5.

Again I know you're saying this that's more for other posters.