What should P4P lists be based on?

[jas]

1. how good the fighter is
2. resume
3. exceptional achievements e.g. being a champion at age 49

[junior gong]

Did I miss something? I'm sure the concept has been the same for over a century or so now. The pound for pound best has always been who the best fighter in the world would be, head to head, if size was negated. It seems to have been reinvented in recent years by fanboys and newbs, mainly floydspastics.

[b00g13man]

P4P is all fantasy, so the fighters with the most fantasy wins should be on the list.

#1 Thurman
#2 Rigo
#3 Matthysse
#4 Maidana (in fantasy land all his losses are wins)

These are the must-have's.

And the worst fighter P4P is Amir Khan. He gets brutally KO'd in every fantasy fight.

I'm pretty sure Floyd has way more fantasy wins than all 4 combined.