Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How would Klitschko's career have looked without the use of illegal tactics?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by -Weltschmerz- View Post
    If his chin was so poor, Sam Peter would have stopped him, possibly Wach and Haye as well. They all caught him.
    Come on welts-wlad needed the wise sage of man whose hair and skin was the same as Jesus in order to become the force he has.

    Steward saved his chin from further damage. without steward, he likely keeps eating shots in fights and is in more trouble than he should be. the more damage, the weaker the chin gets. think about how far he has come since before manny.

    Good thing for the klit lovers wlad isn't as close minded as his fans.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by King_ View Post
      People love to make up all kind of fantasy and hypothetical scenarios with Wlad..... meanwhile he's taking out the #2 and 3 fighters in the division in back-to-back fights with ease.


      lol Wlad's legacy/resume grows by the day. Haters can't stand that he's not fighting Wach/Mormeck type voluntary defenses (due to nobody wanting to fight him... for a career payday. now that's saying something) and he's taking out the best the division has to offer and after Pulev..... most likely win the WBC belt, further adding to his legacy.



      Oh well.... time to make more fantasy/hypothetical threads on NSB about Wlad
      Why do you like Klitschko? He's one of the most boring champions in boxing.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Mr.Fantastic View Post
        Look back at a lot of the major fights in HW boxing, a lot of them do nothing but hold and clinch....bunch of snoozefests.

        Wlad has 2-3 bad fights and black america goes apeshit over them. Unlike Floyd's fights, Wlad at least knocks them out most in most of them.
        I agree. it was only a couple fights were wlads clinching was too the point of being illegal. anyway,,,,most of the times his opponents ended up on there backs anyway

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Pigeons View Post
          Why do you like Klitschko? He's one of the most boring champions in boxing.
          I don't think he's boring. He systematically breaks his opponents down and then KO's them. It's a thing of beauty.



          He may be boring to some, but he's no more "boring" then Ward, Floyd or any other elite boxer.

          Wlad has one of the best jabs-straight right hands the sport has ever seen (IMO)

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by King_ View Post
            I don't think he's boring. He systematically breaks his opponents down and then KO's them. It's a thing of beauty.



            He may be boring to some, but he's no more "boring" then Ward, Floyd or any other elite boxer.

            Wlad has one of the best jabs-straight right hands the sport has ever seen (IMO)
            But you post negatively about Ward for his style. Klitschko's style is beautiful? Have you seen him fight? It seems you have selective vision. Europower!

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Pigeons View Post
              But you post negatively about Ward for his style. Klitschko's style is beautiful? Have you seen him fight? It seems you have selective vision. Europower!
              What the hell is wrong with you?


              I have NO problem with Ward's style. I am not one of those posters who calls Ward/Floyd boring and complains about clinching/boxing, etc.


              I never once complained about Wards style. All i ever said about Ward is the fighters he beat ******/were overrated and he never fought a fighter with Golovkins or Kovalevs style.

              Comment


              • #67
                He has to clinch because his chin is no good

                There is no boxer than clinches more than Wlad

                Floyd, Ward and Khan ( last fight) clinch a lot, but not as much as Wlad

                If you look at the best HW in the world is a clincher

                the best boxer in the world is a clincher

                and the best middleweight in the world is a clincher, but champions seem to get the benefit of the doubt

                Its up to the ref to stop it

                Comment


                • #68
                  Honeslty and i am being honest, lately he averages more clinches a round then punches

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    But Wlad does what he has to do to win and more then not he ends his fights with knockouts..so **** it

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by King_ View Post
                      People love to make up all kind of fantasy and hypothetical scenarios with Wlad..... meanwhile he's taking out the #2 and 3 fighters in the division in back-to-back fights with ease.


                      lol Wlad's legacy/resume grows by the day. Haters can't stand that he's not fighting Wach/Mormeck type voluntary defenses (due to nobody wanting to fight him... for a career payday. now that's saying something) and he's taking out the best the division has to offer and after Pulev..... most likely win the WBC belt, further adding to his legacy.



                      Oh well.... time to make more fantasy/hypothetical threads on NSB about Wlad
                      ^^^^this. all these haters can keep talking about this negativity or that negativity but at the end of the day wlad is an ATG and legendary heavyweight. he ducks nobody and is taking out all the best in his division.

                      true #1 p4p inside and outside of the ring.
                      Last edited by Divine Hammer; 10-30-2014, 03:12 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP