Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: Hopefully I'll Face Floyd Mayweather Next Year

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by megadeth View Post
    I get what you're saying but they are similar in the fact that they are both counterpunchers. The way they do the counter punching is the difference. Floyd is defensive and much more econimical with his punches. JMM is much more aggressive, takes more chances and throws alot more combinations. They are both thinkers, set lots of traps and like for fighters to come to them, especially being agressive. What I am trying to find out is why you would think that Floyd could execute the same gameplan that Marquez does if need be. Also, like I said, there is more than one way to beat Pac. Give Pac movement (ala Mosley) and he easily gets confused. So what happens when Floyd uses movement, a long jab, a long straight right, counters, speed, a higher ring IQ and his defense?
    and thats what i was trying to point out. marquez takes some to gain some while floyd doesnt. thats why i said look at marquez's face for all 4 fights and tell me is floyd willing to put himself thru that.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Evol View Post
      so u left me a message at 12:46pm for being defensive then came back at 10:38pm to leave me another message for being defensive? but i didnt even post in here again until this morning LOL. the 2nd message u left me is at 10:38pm yesterday LOL
      smh......... you're a lost cause.

      At least you finally admitted you had been wrong, something you diverted to do from the start of me calling you out no matter what time of day it was.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by WESS View Post
        smh......... you're a lost cause.

        At least you finally admitted you had been wrong, something you diverted to do from the start of me calling you out no matter what time of day it was.
        I know the truth hurts. Next time don't lurk like a creep, post and speak ur mind if u're against something. Look how much ur posting now after lurking hahah

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Evol View Post
          I know the truth hurts. Next time don't lurk like a creep, post and speak ur mind if u're against something. Look how much ur posting now after lurking hahah
          You would know. My point was validated and justified by your own actions. You apologized and admitted you were in the wrong.

          At this point if I could I would take the red k back due to you apologizing.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Evol View Post
            and thats what i was trying to point out. marquez takes some to gain some while floyd doesnt. thats why i said look at marquez's face for all 4 fights and tell me is floyd willing to put himself thru that.
            I agree, but that's mostly because Marquez is also much less defensively sound than Floyd is and much more agressive. But that doesn't necessarily mean that Floyd HAS to fight like Marquez to beat him. That is just one way to do it and IMO, Floyd could use that blueprint, improve on it and not have to take as much abuse. Pac isn't Maidana. He is not the size or as durable. He is not going to continue attacking attacking attacking after getting countered tme and time again, walking into couners. After a while, he is gonna become much more cautious(especially after the Marquez KO), his punch output will go down, just like almost all of Floyd's opponents.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by WESS View Post
              You would know. My point was validated and justified by your own actions. You apologized and admitted you were in the wrong.

              At this point if I could I would take the red k back due to you apologizing.
              my point was validated too. lurking creep gets called out then comes in and post in here and act like u was gonna come post in here anways. yeah 10hrs later LOL!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by megadeth View Post
                I agree, but that's mostly because Marquez is also much less defensively sound than Floyd is and much more agressive. But that doesn't necessarily mean that Floyd HAS to fight like Marquez to beat him. That is just one way to do it and IMO, Floyd could use that blueprint, improve on it and not have to take as much abuse. Pac isn't Maidana. He is not the size or as durable. He is not going to continue attacking attacking attacking after getting countered tme and time again, walking into couners. After a while, he is gonna become much more cautious(especially after the Marquez KO), his punch output will go down, just like almost all of Floyd's opponents.
                thats the thing, u cant beat pac by not out punching him. with floyd he would rather wait and wait and wait until the right time to throw while marquez fights fire with fire and throws at the same time when manny is throwing. thats how marquez was able to capitalized on pac's mistakes.

                if marquez would have been more defensive he would have lost the 4th fight or possibly get ko/tko. u're right, pac aint maidana, pac is much more than what maidana can ever pose. pac is not as duarable as maidana? really? LOL
                maidana is rios version 1.0 (a much improve rios thats all). LOL

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Evol View Post
                  my point was validated too. lurking creep gets called out then comes in and post in here and act like u was gonna come post in here anways. yeah 10hrs later LOL!
                  You didn't have a point. You diverted the topic to "lurking" because you got called out. It was a defensive measure on your part and is still irrelevant to the point of you being wrong. You turned it into why and when did I call you out rather than addressing the fact you had been wrong. Which you eventually did.

                  So, you can get over it now. Or at least I would think you should be able to.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by WESS View Post
                    You didn't have a point. You diverted the topic to "lurking" because you got called out. It was a defensive measure on your part and is still irrelevant to the point of you being wrong. You turned it into why and when did I call you out rather than addressing the fact you had been wrong. Which you eventually did.

                    So, you can get over it now. Or at least I would think you should be able to.
                    my original conversation with u was regarding u lurking on here so how could i be diverting? next time address the problem instead of sending a neg rep and then comes and express ur feelings 10 hrs later only after being called a lurker LOL!

                    Comment


                    • if i didnt send u a neg rep back and called u a lurking creep, would u have come and post in here? LOL!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP