ESPN's New P4P Rankings

[Larry the boss]

So how should they be ranked, lets see if your make sense regarding this 3.....

also, floyd arguably lost to a "first face brawler" (far from a p4p fighter) and he's still p4p #1..

Bradley should be ranked over Juan...and Manny should not be #2..and Floyd did not arguably lose period....there is not case you can make for that....Manny actually is 2-2 in his last 4...hardly p4p#2.

[Kuyukut]

my thoughts exactly kuyukut, if the people want to see a real p4p list look no further than my sig

very true, majority of boxing fans would totally agree with hopkins as #1.

[BluesMan]

ESPN is truly BSPN....

[STREET CLEANER]

What a crap list. Here's the real P4P list:


1)Wlad Klitschko
2)Floyd Mayweather
3)Gennady Golovkin
4)Roman Gonzalez
5)Guillermo Rigondeaux
6)Sergey Kovalev
7)Manny Pacquiao
8)Timothy Bradley
9)Vasyl Lomachenko
10)Juan Manuel Marquez


First of all Andre Ward is retired. Any list with Ward in it is automatically invalid until he returns to the ring. Also any list without Wlad as #1 is invalid because he- and any other HW champion in boxing history is the reason there's even a fantasy "P4P" list in the first place.

Terrance Crawford is on the outside looking in and next in line, IMO.

Your list is worst

[Beercules]

Why no Briggs?

[Dr Rumack]

Why no Briggs?

[megadeth]

So how should they be ranked, lets see if yours makes sense regarding these 3.....

also, floyd arguably lost to a "first face brawler" (far from a p4p fighter) and he's still p4p #1..

Who's arguing it?

[brick wall]

Bradley should be ranked over Juan...and Manny should not be #2..and Floyd did not arguably lose period....there is not case you can make for that....Manny actually is 2-2 in his last 4...hardly p4p#2.

for sure those espn people didn't think pac lost to bradley in their first fight and rightfully so...that's 2 wins over bradley. if you think bradley should be ranked over marquez then the guy who beat bradley twice should be ranked above both of them.

[TBear]

ESPN is trolling!

[megadeth]

for sure those espn people didn't think pac lost to bradley in their first fight and rightfully so...that's 2 wins over bradley. if you think bradley should be ranked over marquez then the guy who beat bradley twice should be ranked above both of them.

Well if u count it that way, then what about the 2 losses to Marquez?