Originally posted by Sterling Archer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
ESPN's New P4P Rankings
Collapse
-
Boxing needs its own cable channel, seriously. Only ex-fighters and guys who actually watch and understand the mechanics of the sport should be talking on it.
Golovkin is one of my favorite fighters right now, but they have him above Wlad and Gonzalez. Not to mention Froch is no where to be found.
Comment
-
Originally posted by King_ View PostWhat a crap list. Here's the real P4P list:
1)Wlad Klitschko
2)Floyd Mayweather
3)Gennady Golovkin
4)Roman Gonzalez
5)Guillermo Rigondeaux
6)Sergey Kovalev
7)Manny Pacquiao
8)Timothy Bradley
9)Vasyl Lomachenko
10)Juan Manuel Marquez
First of all Andre Ward is retired. Any list with Ward in it is automatically invalid until he returns to the ring. Also any list without Wlad as #1 is invalid because he- and any other HW champion in boxing history is the reason there's even a fantasy "P4P" list in the first place.
Terrance Crawford is on the outside looking in and next in line, IMO.
Comment
-
-
Being able to evaluate skill levels is as important as reading wins & looses and opponents names.
Being successful for 10 years and fighting nobodies doesn't relate to be a p4p king. It should get you in the HoF but lacking so many skills can't rank you in a p4p rating!
Joe Louis was never given credit for his wins once the division was depleted but his methods & techniques were never in question. p4p is about skill level
not popularity.
Comment
-
Originally posted by King_ View PostWhat a crap list. Here's the real P4P list:
1)Wlad Klitschko
2)Floyd Mayweather
3)Gennady Golovkin
4)Roman Gonzalez
5)Guillermo Rigondeaux
6)Sergey Kovalev
7)Manny Pacquiao
8)Timothy Bradley
9)Vasyl Lomachenko
10)Juan Manuel Marquez
First of all Andre Ward is retired. Any list with Ward in it is automatically invalid until he returns to the ring. Also any list without Wlad as #1 is invalid because he- and any other HW champion in boxing history is the reason there's even a fantasy "P4P" list in the first place.
Terrance Crawford is on the outside looking in and next in line, IMO.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ray Corso View PostBeing able to evaluate skill levels is as important as reading wins & looses and opponents names.
Being successful for 10 years and fighting nobodies doesn't relate to be a p4p king. It should get you in the HoF but lacking so many skills can't rank you in a p4p rating!
Joe Louis was never given credit for his wins once the division was depleted but his methods & techniques were never in question. p4p is about skill level
not popularity.
Comment
-
Originally posted by just the facts View PostHoly crap this list is even worse than theirs. Wlad #1??? GGG with zero quality wins?? Kovalev with zero quality wins??? Lomanchenko with 3 pro fights and one of them is a loss at #9??? This is a P4P ranking, not a list of your favorite fighter
my top 5:
1. wlad
2. froch
3. pac
4. gonzalez
5. rigoLast edited by Divine Hammer; 10-22-2014, 06:57 PM.
Comment
Comment