What's so funny about that? Golovkin has very little defence and has never faced anyone Groves' size with his kind of combined speed & power. It's very plausible that Groves could have dropped Golovkin.
Much more plausible than a **** average smaller fighter like Curtis Stevens hurting Froch.
Reaching for sparring rumours? Dude you just reached to say that you wouldn't be surprised if Stevens hurt Froch. You reached to a fantasy fight that's never going to happen....lol you really don't see this stuff, do you?
Froch would handle Stevens like the bum he is.
He's been badly hurt once by Groves. Stunned is not the same as being badly hurt. And just to reiterate, he's been facing a laundry list of world class fighters and excellent punchers not cab drivers.
Stevens can punch, that's the single thing he is good at, nothing else. Froch lets himself get hit with sucker shots, and the idea he'd get tagged a time or two before taking the fight over isn't any sort of reach... it's the exact script to many of his fights.
What's so funny about that? Golovkin has very little defence and has never faced anyone Groves' size with his kind of combined speed & power. It's very plausible that Groves could have dropped Golovkin.
Much more plausible than a **** average smaller fighter like Curtis Stevens hurting Froch.
For his style, Golovkin's defence is very good, he slips punches very well. It's certeinly better than Froch's who's got no defence. Stevens tagged GGG couple of times with his left hook and Golovkin didn't even flinch.
Stop acting like Froch is some defence master, he would get tagged by Stevens too, probably more than Golovkin did.
And like Foreign Soil said, Stevens definitely can **** and Froch has been hurt many times in his career.
Stevens can punch, that's the single thing he is good at, nothing else. Froch lets himself get hit with sucker shots, and the idea he'd get tagged a time or two before taking the fight over isn't any sort of reach... it's the exact script to many of his fights.
Groves dropping GGG is UK trolling.
Arthur Abraham could punch and he didn't land a glove on Froch because he was too small and got his head boxed off. And Abraham is far better than Stevens. As are all of Froch's recent opponets. FAR better. Trying to suggest that a journeyman fighter like Curtis fackin Stevens would be some sort of threat to Froch is laughable.
What is so hard to believe about Groves flooring Golovkin exactly?
For his style, Golovkin's defence is very good, he slips punches very well. It's certeinly better than Froch's who's got no defence. Stevens tagged GGG couple of times with his left hook and Golovkin didn't even flinch.
Stop acting like Froch is some defence master, he would get tagged by Stevens too, probably more than Golovkin did.
And like Foreign Soil said, Stevens definitely can **** and Froch has been hurt many times in his career.
Golovkin's defence is far from good. I never claimed Froch has a good defence.
Wow...now any old can that can punch hurts Froch? LOL....you guys are laugable.
Stevens is a midget bum who Froch would probably put away in 3 or 4 rounds.
Arthur Abraham could punch and he didn't land a glove on Froch because he was too small and got his head boxed off. And Abraham is far better than Stevens. As are all of Froch's recent opponets. FAR better. Trying to suggest that a journeyman fighter like Curtis fackin Stevens would be some sort of threat to Froch is laughable.
What is so hard to believe about Groves flooring Golovkin exactly?
Golovkin's defence is far from good. I never claimed Froch has a good defence.
Wow...now any old can that can punch hurts Froch? LOL....you guys are laugable.
Stevens is a midget bum who Froch would probably put away in 3 or 4 rounds.
Please Abraham fights nothing life Stevens, he's slow and you can see his wide hooks before he even throws them. Stevens is fast and very explosive, he throws short, fast hooks.
Most probably Froch would keep him on the outside with his jab and KO him somewhere in the later rounds but Stevens could and would land clean punches because almost every Froch fights, does it. Would it be enough to hurt or drop Froch?Probably not but then again we will never know.
Stop getting all worked up because someone questioned great British fighter's chin.
Froch got caught cold once and people are forgetting the rest of the bombs that Groves landed just bouncing off him? Pascal, Kessler, Abraham....all these guys can **** and Froch walked through countless bombs from all of them....Stevens is not bothering Froch, at all. He would land, fairly often, but he'd get zero reaction.
As for Ward-Golovkin, I'd be rooting for GGG and also cconfident that he could do the business.
Please Abraham fights nothing life Stevens, he's slow and you can see his wide hooks before he even throws them. Stevens is fast and very explosive, he throws short, fast hooks.
Most probably Froch would keep him on the outside with his jab and KO him somewhere in the later rounds but Stevens could and would land clean punches because almost every Froch fights, does it. Would it be enough to hurt or drop Froch?Probably not but then again we will never know.
Stop getting all worked up because someone questioned great British fighter's chin.
Yeah Abraham is a two time world champion and Stevens is a club fighter.
There's nothing questionable about Froch's chin. It's proven against world class fighters. The only questions remain are over Golovkin
Arthur Abraham could punch and he didn't land a glove on Froch because he was too small and got his head boxed off. And Abraham is far better than Stevens. As are all of Froch's recent opponets. FAR better. Trying to suggest that a journeyman fighter like Curtis fackin Stevens would be some sort of threat to Froch is laughable.
What is so hard to believe about Groves flooring Golovkin exactly?
Golovkin's defence is far from good. I never claimed Froch has a good defence.
Wow...now any old can that can punch hurts Froch? LOL....you guys are laugable.
Stevens is a midget bum who Froch would probably put away in 3 or 4 rounds.
You took nearly everything I said the wrong way. Won't bother with much of that but simply Froch's chin is overrated, but who cares? Just find it humorous with the "legendary" talks.
Comment