Is Everyone Overrated???
Collapse
-
-
The best example has been Canelo. Since he signed with HBO-a number of his critics here on NSB have changed how they post about him-and he hasn't even fought on HBO yet.I like GGG and if he signed with Haymon and got big fights, then who cares....but I know what you're saying man, there would be a lot of flip flopping going on if that were to happen.
If I remember correctly, Paul Williams was with Haymon and he got matched up fine IMO
Its all in what a posters favorite fighter gets out of it. The Tim Bradley syndrome-when he beat Manny and Provo-he was a robber that ****** and who lost both and wasn't a p4p fighter. when the rematch with Manny was signed-those same guys touted his #3 p4p ranking.
Just how some on NSB operate.Comment
-
the thunderdome is there for that and resolving other disputes. I am a poster that has derailed threads with inane and repetitive back and forths on occasions. Lately ive tried to avoid this.Last edited by The Big Dunn; 10-14-2014, 09:40 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Depends on the fan, you can only ever judge a fighter on who they fought and beat and what they achieved in the sport during their career. Little point making fantasy fights between eras.There is a clear formula...
The further back in time you go.. The more overrated the boxer.
And the closer you get to present... The more underrated the fighter.
With a few exceptions in the 60's and 70's where some of the boxers became so overrated they transcended the general rule.
That's pretty much boxing in a nut shell!
Losses do carry more weight today though because the best seldom fight the best often. A lot more losses in the early period of boxing history because there was one champion and his mandatory was often the next best fighter in that weight class.Comment
-
Not a valid comparison. GGG's "lesser opponents" are eons better than Wilder's.Haymon's use of his leverage in power is one thing. Making general statements about undefeated records is another.
Deontay wilder and GGG come to mind-the undefeated record is developed solely on beating lesser fighters. Neither has beaten a fighter who is "on their level". That doesn't mean GGG isn't highly skilled and wilder doesn't have power.
Posters are going to like what they like-nothing wrong with that.
The only opponent of any substance Wilder has beaten is Scott, and even Scott was coming off a stoppage loss to Chisora.
GGG beat Geale, Macklin, Rosado, Proksa - not exactly the murderers' row, but compared to Wilder's opposition, they are downright great.
Don't even try to argue that the only reason GGG is popular and Wilder is not is because Wilder is with Haymon. We both know it's not true.Comment
-
Totally agree....as I did say the same thing right below his original postNot a valid comparison. GGG's "lesser opponents" are eons better than Wilder's.
The only opponent of any substance Wilder has beaten is Scott, and even Scott was coming off a stoppage loss to Chisora.
GGG beat Geale, Macklin, Rosado, Proksa - not exactly the murderers' row, but compared to Wilder's opposition, they are downright great.
Don't even try to argue that the only reason GGG is popular and Wilder is not is because Wilder is with Haymon. We both know it's not true.Comment
-
Comment
Comment