Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Mayweather Sr: Floyd Would Beat Pacquiao The Hell Up!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by megadeth View Post
    When you have 2 negotiations and one legitimately negotiates while the other either doesn't bother negotiating or walks away, then who is the "1 guy" who is showing he wants the fight? Yet this somehow you will ignore or make excuses for it.

    What does "who has more to lose" have to do with anything? So Floyd has only fought undefeated fighters? What I do know that Ariza AND Roach(2 guys that hate each other and have NO reason to agree) have come out and said EXACTLY the same thing. That Arum didn't want Pac to fight Floyd.....
    I'm glad you said that cuz floyd offers take it or leave it deals like he did with the glove situation on the first maidana fight.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by SeekDaGreat View Post
      Lmao. Senior is smoking meth again.
      I think he got another bad batch bro. He needs to start spending money and stop settling for that cheap, laced ****.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by megadeth View Post
        Saying something and doing it are two different things. Why doesn't this apply to Pac as well?
        Simple . Pac does what he says.

        Remember when Jr said "PAC is NEXT", and the next day he said he didn't say that , LOL. You can't believe a word from Joy Jr, you can't TRUST his word.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
          Dude 40m flat is not legit negotiating, its legit making sure the fight doesn't happen. Gtfo
          Lol at "legitimate negotiating"....it's like if I draw and sign up an contract to send you to sign where I fight with brass knuckles and you with feather gloves...fight takes place in my backyard with my buddy reffing....i get $100 and you get $20. There are no negotiations since I'm TBE so don't ask because I won't answer your phone call. you refuse offer that means you're ducking.
          Last edited by HeGotPacProblem; 10-13-2014, 10:52 AM.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by megadeth View Post
            When you have 2 negotiations and one legitimately negotiates while the other either doesn't bother negotiating or walks away, then who is the "1 guy" who is showing he wants the fight? Yet this somehow you will ignore or make excuses for it.

            What does "who has more to lose" have to do with anything? So Floyd has only fought undefeated fighters? What I do know that Ariza AND Roach(2 guys that hate each other and have NO reason to agree) have come out and said EXACTLY the same thing. That Arum didn't want Pac to fight Floyd.....
            I like your style! Don't let them forget history. I just finished watching Stephen A. talk about Floyd, and he's right, If Floyd doesn't want Manny, he has to get Canelo or Cotto, and NOT Amir Khan. However, I would place some caveats on Stephen A.'s comments: One, if Khan beats Thurman, he deserves the fight, because Thurman is a legitimate WW. Two, I would add GGG to the mix, because he's just as formidable (if not more) than Cotto, Canelo, Khan, and Pacquiao! If Floyd wants to silence the critics without fighting Manny, he should make a fight with GGG!

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by megadeth View Post
              You are the LAST person that should be talking about "blinded by love". Unlike you, I don't lay the blame on one side, or critisize only one side while ignoring what happens with the other. I say they both have some blame in the fight not being made and that hasn't changed. Meanwhile all Pac has to do is mention fighting Floyd and you are, eating up every word and ignoring all him and his teams "roadblocks".
              Roadblocks? hhmmmm lets see
              40 mil no ppv, marquez problems, "he brings nothing to the table", leave bob arum, sign on to tmt and get a couple of fights in, "pacquiaos juicing" (oh thats rright pac took him to court and little ***** ass floydie settled).

              meanwhile pacquiao says, "anytime, anywhere" for the past 2 years and you heard squat from floydie except, "he has marquez problems"

              Here, stop making extra excuses for floydie and listen, cuz the man speaks for himself:

              Comment


              • #47
                Only one way to know for sure. but Pac has to sign to TMT and blah blah blah

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
                  I like your style! Don't let them forget history. I just finished watching Stephen A. talk about Floyd, and he's right, If Floyd doesn't want Manny, he has to get Canelo or Cotto, and NOT Amir Khan. However, I would place some caveats on Stephen A.'s comments: One, if Khan beats Thurman, he deserves the fight, because Thurman is a legitimate WW. Two, I would add GGG to the mix, because he's just as formidable (if not more) than Cotto, Canelo, Khan, and Pacquiao! If Floyd wants to silence the critics without fighting Manny, he should make a fight with GGG!
                  They're all worthy but the kind of boxers we haven't seen Floyd are the fast ones...aside from Judah whom he had trouble with early on and was taken out of his element where had to be on the offensive rather than just playing defense and countering.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
                    I like your style! Don't let them forget history. I just finished watching Stephen A. talk about Floyd, and he's right, If Floyd doesn't want Manny, he has to get Canelo or Cotto, and NOT Amir Khan. However, I would place some caveats on Stephen A.'s comments: One, if Khan beats Thurman, he deserves the fight, because Thurman is a legitimate WW. Two, I would add GGG to the mix, because he's just as formidable (if not more) than Cotto, Canelo, Khan, and Pacquiao! If Floyd wants to silence the critics without fighting Manny, he should make a fight with GGG!
                    Thats right stephen a smith said that floydie is ducking pacquiao. Glad you agree with him.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by HeGotPacProblem View Post
                      Because both camps have pointed the finger at eachother. Putting biases aside, you try to look objectively at both boxers and their mindset of taking or not taking on the megafight. Pac is not the guy who is undefeated and was willing to fight JMM 4 and possibly 5 times..a guy who has given him fits and KOed him. He also has financial problems and would be more than happy to make the kind of $ only a Floyd fight can bring.

                      I've mentioned this a few times here..you just don't get it.
                      Please stop. He waited a long time between 2 and 3 and they even admitted that they thought he was done before fight #3. What does that tell u? They didn't think he was much risk at that time...espcially at WW. So let's forget that Floyd fought 2 immediate rematches with the only guys to give him trouble as well as fighting Mosley, Cotto and Canelo 3 in circumstances where Pac was or is unwilling to. Pac has had financial problems for a long time so if that is a reason, why not fight him in 2012? So yes, I get it just fine....still doesn't erase anything.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP