You would fancy him even against Andre Dirrell? That guy beat even Froch I don't think that Groves would pass that test.
And sorry but his win over DeGale was 3 years ago and since than his resume didn't become so much better he collected some wins over mediocre guys and he lost (I think the first was a BS stoppage) twice to Froch, so I hardly consider the DeGale win as a good start point to judge Groves present postion on the division rankings. IMO Paul Williams isn't a big deal and I also don't think that Glen Johnson with his 17 loss is a decent win. But sure Groves has big talent, I think also that he would beat anyone in SMW not named Froch, Ward and Andre Dirrell. And I don't know much about Anthony Dirrell yet, that fight would be 50-50 IMO. Dirrel didn't look good against Bika, but Bika is a very awkward oppponent, it's hard to look good against him, even Ward struggled with him in the first 3-4 rounds. So I wait already with judging the younger Dirrell.
And sorry but his win over DeGale was 3 years ago and since than his resume didn't become so much better he collected some wins over mediocre guys and he lost (I think the first was a BS stoppage) twice to Froch, so I hardly consider the DeGale win as a good start point to judge Groves present postion on the division rankings. IMO Paul Williams isn't a big deal and I also don't think that Glen Johnson with his 17 loss is a decent win. But sure Groves has big talent, I think also that he would beat anyone in SMW not named Froch, Ward and Andre Dirrell. And I don't know much about Anthony Dirrell yet, that fight would be 50-50 IMO. Dirrel didn't look good against Bika, but Bika is a very awkward oppponent, it's hard to look good against him, even Ward struggled with him in the first 3-4 rounds. So I wait already with judging the younger Dirrell.
Comment