What will tarnish a fighters legacy more?

[PAC-BOY]

Ducking a fighter for years and never fighting him...

Or

Being Kod by another great fighter

key word: Tarnish!!!

Poll...

[Vasyl’s dad]

Ducking by far. Even in defeat, at least you tried, and still get paid. Ducking nets zero.

[DeadLikeMe]

Both are the first thing people will remember about each fighter, respectively.

[URAGONAKO]

The one who says to KO his opponent but always ended in running inside the ring... may I say her name?

[beerbelly14]

All I know is that pacquiao nearly died in that fight. I mean he was out cold sleeping. Not a good look to get incapacitated by a guy Floyd toyed with.

[PAC-BOY]

Both are the first thing people will remember about each fighter, respectively.

Yes, i agree..but we are talking about Tarnish. Not Good.

[Vasyl’s dad]

Both are the first thing people will remember about each fighter, respectively.

Yup
Marquez 4
Morales 3
Barrera 2
Cotto
Margarito
Etc. Everyone will remember how he tried to fight floyd and donate the money to charity and they will rremember how floyd balked.


Everyone will remember floyd ducking the entire wwelterweight division for a few years.

[The Big Dunn]

hahah you made a thread. and then you switched around what I said,

I think boxing remembers "down goes frazier", "no mas", and "he aint getting up jim" more than they do Bowe throwing belt in trash can or SRR not fighting Burley or Manny and floyd not fighting.

[El-blanco]

Floyd is a joke to the majority of the population outside of a group of beliebers, by far ducking has destroyed his reputation and legacy. And unfortunately taken away from what a great boxer he is.

[beerbelly14]

Floyd is a joke to the majority of the population outside of a group of beliebers, by far ducking has destroyed his reputation and legacy. And unfortunately taken away from what a great boxer he is.

That "joke" still outsells the "peoples champ" by hundreds of thousands in PPV revenue