Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wladimir Klitschko manhandles a Anti-Boxing female interviewer from Times Magazine

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    She looks like an old cow.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by FrankieBruno View Post
      Boring interview, nice chap though

      Mike Tyson/Tyson Fury interviews>>life itself


      Damn look how tiny Khan's wrists are compared to Thurman's.

      Comment


      • #33
        lol at "..you gonna jump on the shit....err chair" hehe

        Comment


        • #34
          Awesome ambassador of the sport outside the ring, just a shame he is as dull as watching paint dry once he steps inside the ring.

          Comment


          • #35
            i don't think the interview sounded hostile in the least. she's just ignorant.



            you guys have to understand how little people, especially contemporary western women, know or care about boxing.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Cupo303 View Post
              It's like his fights, he controlled her from start to finish, not falling into any of her traps. She doesn't know anything about boxing and expected some dumb meathead but he outclassed and outsmarted this Catlady-like Feminist with his charm and wit.


              ^Talk about debonair, dude has charm and wit of James bond, no wonder he is such a ladies man. He has the looks, the height, the boxing talent, and charm, even if he had no money you can tell he can pull tail very easy.

              Comment


              • #37
                The more females try to take over, the more they get stunted and abused. Good thing this interview wasn't conducted on ESPN...

                Comment


                • #38
                  She seemed nice.
                  From the OP i thought she would be a b1tch.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by #1Assassin View Post
                    this was for time magazine.

                    a lot of people looking at this or reading it are not going to be boxing fans, she is asking questions people who arent very familiar with the sport might want to know.

                    i dont think she seems to be anti boxing at all, she clearly doesnt have any personal interest in it but that doesnt mean she is against it. the question about violence is a valid one, many people ask themselves that and i think its good she gave him a chance to explain in his own words.

                    if i was interviewing a darts player i would probably be like "so, basically you throw little arrows at a target for a living?" and "how would you get someone who thinks darts is hardly a sport certainly not an exciting one into watching?". it comes off disrespectful, but that honestly wasnt my intent when writing those questions.

                    rather than being all high and mighty and look down at people for not being knowledgeable about boxing why dont we just take a page out of the champs book and educate them in a respectful way?


                    i dont think she was manhandled in the least, i think she did a good job representing the people who will read this magazine just as he did a good job representing the sport of boxing. good stuff.
                    Well she pretty much broke all rules of journalistic practice, so no she did not do a good job in any way.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
                      Well she pretty much broke all rules of journalistic practice, so no she did not do a good job in any way.
                      As if you would know anything about journalism

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP