It could be argued that Naseem brought the kinda excitement to the lighter divisions in the 90's, that Tyson brought to the world of boxing in the 80's. Naz had the most original and exciting entrances, constantly caused controversy and was P4P one of the biggest punchers in the game...he also paved the way for fighters in the lighter divisions to make more money. Hamed-Kelley was an all time classic. He unified the division and remained undefeated throughout the 90's, again similar to Tyson in the 80's.
Before the hate starts, this is not saying he was the best, but perhaps the most exciting?
What are your opinions?
Before the hate starts, this is not saying he was the best, but perhaps the most exciting?
What are your opinions?
Comment