Dwyer says Pacquiao has better chance beating GGG than Khan, Thurman or Brook

**Dean_Razorback** · 09-11-2014, 11:06 AM

******* is a helluva drug

**Jsmooth9876** · 09-11-2014, 11:10 AM

No idea who Dwyer is but he obviously DKSAB that's for sure. GGG doesn't have concert feet first off, he moves well and cuts off the ring great. Khan with his pitter patter two handed shots would get caught with a straight left and be out cold. Thurman hasn't proven anything yet as much as I like him.manny would still beat any welter not named Floyd and at 152 would batter Canelo around the ring the same as Floyd did.

**deanrw** · 09-11-2014, 11:10 AM

Dwyer is an imbecile, at least when it comes to boxing. He considers himself some sort of expert, but he really doesn't have a clue. He only considers and looks at a few select intangibles, and disregards everything else. LOL

**Weebler I** · 09-11-2014, 11:16 AM

Originally posted by hectari

I just watched that long azz Dwyer video about Manny Pacquiao and he said that Manny Pacquiao should take a chance and go up to 160 or 154 to fight certain guys who he has a chance against, he claims Khan, thurman and Brook would all be too much for Manny at 147 stylistically and claims Pac has better chance going to fight GGG for the 160 pound belt because GGG is concrete foot and will have trouble with Manny's speed or something like that.

LOL this dude is tripping. So Khan will beat Manny yet GGG who is a bigger stronger harder hitting Man than Khan will have trouble and possibly lose to Manny? One grazing punch from GGG and Pac will be sleeping.

Dude is off his rocker. I do agree with him that Pac loses to Khan, Brook, or Thurman but to say he has a better shot at beating GGG than those guys is lame.

He's so obsessed with styles that he overlooks the impact of size, power and punch resistance.

If you want an assessment of how two styles will match-up he's pretty good, otherwise he's very hit and miss.

**El-blanco** · 09-11-2014, 11:21 AM

Ggg is wayyyyyyy too big for manny. I could honestly see him going down in the first round. This guys an idiot, maybe he should go up to 175 and fight kovalev while he's at it.

**deanrw** · 09-11-2014, 11:22 AM

Originally posted by Weebler I

He's so obsessed with styles that he overlooks the impact of size, power and punch resistance.

If you want an assessment of how two styles will match-up he's pretty good, otherwise he's very hit and miss.

Yup. Lets say Golovkin decided to defend his title against Anthony Mundine. While the rest of the world would be outraged over such a fight even being considered, Dwyer, I guarantee would pick Mundine to win. He does not consider that Mundine is washed up, cannot take a punch and cannot take pressure. Dwyer has tunnel vision, and only considers what he sees in that small window.

**SeekDaGreat** · 09-11-2014, 11:23 AM

Yeah, he's right.

**IronDanHamza** · 09-11-2014, 11:24 AM

Why is he comparing Welterweights to Middleweights?

Dwyer has absolutely no idea what he's talking about.

This moron said Victor Cayo would beat Marcos Maidana 9 times out of 10. He actually said that.

He said that Devon Alexander has a great jab.

He said Lucian Bute would beat Froch....After the first fight!

He's an idiot, plain and simple.

**FlatLine** · 09-11-2014, 11:26 AM

khan has better chance beating pacquiao than even wlad klitschko does it's pretty much well-accepted by the leading boxing experts in the game and has been for many years now. why do you think mayweather, broner, bradley, marquez and pacquiao ducked him? it's not some sort of random coincidence those guys wouldn't even agree to a fight with khan if they could do a 5-man tag team vs 1.

Dwyer says Pacquiao has better chance beating GGG than Khan, Thurman or Brook