Of course they do.
Whether you think there's too many titles now or even tiers of them, the fact that someone holds a title means they are atleast among the very best in their region or the world.
As far as my opinion on world titles goes.. I think they would be best going back to 3 titles (like when it was WBA, WBC and IBF).
Most definitely they should immediately abolish all "tiers" of a championship. For instance this "regular" and "super" champion stuff is nothing but garbage, designed purely for the authority to make a bit more money from a "title" fight that otherwise would be a runner up.
Whether you think there's too many titles now or even tiers of them, the fact that someone holds a title means they are atleast among the very best in their region or the world.
As far as my opinion on world titles goes.. I think they would be best going back to 3 titles (like when it was WBA, WBC and IBF).
Most definitely they should immediately abolish all "tiers" of a championship. For instance this "regular" and "super" champion stuff is nothing but garbage, designed purely for the authority to make a bit more money from a "title" fight that otherwise would be a runner up.
Comment