[POLL] Better Match - Broner vs. Taylor or Matthysse vs. Ortiz?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Da Machine
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2012
    • 6317
    • 288
    • 17
    • 13,741

    #71
    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
    The fact that Taylor has been in with Algieri, Mayfield and Cayo (2 wins, 1 loss) makes him a better opponent than someone who has been fighting bin men.



    You were too dumb to understand the post

    The point was that you mention that Taylor has lost a few times and that Ortiz is unbeaten so that automatically makes him better even though Taylor has mixed in higher company

    Using that logic, Carlos > John. Amirite?

    Look at the votes kid, just stop....

    Comment

    • Dirk Diggler UK
      Deleted
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 48836
      • 1,312
      • 693
      • 58,902

      #72
      Originally posted by Da Machine
      Look at the votes kid, just stop....
      Wow....can't talk for himself so uses anonymous votes when in trouble...typical.

      Comment

      • IronDanHamza
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 48371
        • 4,778
        • 266
        • 104,043

        #73
        Originally posted by Da Machine
        Look at the votes kid, just stop....
        Is he right though?

        Is Carlos Molina a better opponent that John Molina or no?

        Comment

        • Da Machine
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2012
          • 6317
          • 288
          • 17
          • 13,741

          #74
          Originally posted by IronDanHamza
          Is he right though?

          Is Carlos Molina a better opponent that John Molina or no?
          **** no......

          Comment

          • IronDanHamza
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 48371
            • 4,778
            • 266
            • 104,043

            #75
            Originally posted by Da Machine
            **** no......
            Of course.

            But using the logic you used then he must be, right?

            Comment

            • Dirk Diggler UK
              Deleted
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 48836
              • 1,312
              • 693
              • 58,902

              #76
              Originally posted by Da Machine
              **** no......
              But John Molina had lost 3 times and had been KO'd

              Comment

              • Da Machine
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2012
                • 6317
                • 288
                • 17
                • 13,741

                #77
                Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                But John Molina had lost 3 times and had been KO'd
                And? If you can't look at both fighters and tell who the better fighter is, that's on you.

                Comment

                • Dirk Diggler UK
                  Deleted
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 48836
                  • 1,312
                  • 693
                  • 58,902

                  #78
                  Originally posted by Da Machine
                  And? If you can't look at both fighters and tell who the better fighter is, that's on you.
                  You said Taylor wasn't good because he had losses. John Molina has losses and a knockout loss too. So we already know that he sucks, right? Carlos only lost once at elite level. So herp de derp.... he's the better fighter.

                  Comment

                  • Da Machine
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2012
                    • 6317
                    • 288
                    • 17
                    • 13,741

                    #79
                    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                    You said Taylor wasn't good because he had losses. John Molina has losses and a knockout loss too. So we already know that he sucks, right? Carlos only lost once at elite level. So herp de derp.... he's the better fighter.
                    No, I said Taylor isn't as good because he has lost every decent fight he's had. We know what he is. We don't know what Ortiz is., but he looks good and hasn't lost.

                    Big difference dumbass. And were comparing Ortiz and Taylor. Not the two Molina's.

                    Quit trying to manufacture arguments because you lost. LMAO. 60%+.

                    It's not even close. I'm done discussing this.

                    Comment

                    • Dirk Diggler UK
                      Deleted
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 48836
                      • 1,312
                      • 693
                      • 58,902

                      #80
                      Originally posted by Da Machine
                      No, I said Taylor isn't as good because he has lost every decent fight he's had. We know what he is. We don't know what Ortiz is., but he looks good and hasn't lost.

                      Big difference dumbass. And were comparing Ortiz and Taylor. Not the two Molina's.

                      Quit trying to manufacture arguments because you lost. LMAO. 60%+.

                      It's not even close. I'm done discussing this.
                      I was never going to use the poll results of NSB as any kind of basis for my argument. NSB is filled with ******s and fanboys like you. Almost everyone on here universally dislikes Broner too.

                      I wanted to see the opinions of intelligent posters who are honest. Freedom blocked all of those people from posting in her thread.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP