Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: 100 Days: The New York Times and Boxing

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: 100 Days: The New York Times and Boxing

    By Thomas Hauser - Five years ago, I wrote an article entitled The New York Times and Boxing. I catalogued every article that appeared in the paper’s sports section over a 100-day period and concluded, “The New York Times no longer covers boxing as an ongoing sport. If a fighter of importance dies, it’s noted. On rare occasions, bouts are referenced. But the paper’s motto – ‘All the News That’s Fit to Print’ – which is prominently displayed in the upper-lefthand corner of page one each day, doesn’t extend to boxing.”

    The response to the article was gratifying. Tom Jolly (then the Times sports editor) invited Larry Merchant and myself to breakfast to discuss ways that the Times might improve its boxing coverage. In due course, Greg Bishop became the paper’s go-to boxing guy. Coverage of the sweet science wasn’t extensive, but at least the Times recognized boxing.

    Now the pendulum has swung again. In 2011, Jolly was promoted to associate managing editor. He was succeeded as sports editor by Joe Sexton, who gave way in January 2013 to Jason Stallman. Earlier this year, Greg Bishop left the paper to take a job with Sports Illustrated. Since Bishop’s departure, boxing has all but disappeared from the Times.

    In May of this year, I decided to repeat my exercise of five years ago. From May 19 through August 26, I tracked every article that appeared in the print edition of the Times that’s distributed in New York.

    The conclusion: The New York Times no longer covers boxing as an ongoing sport. If a fighter of importance dies, it’s noted. On rare occasions, bouts are referenced. But the paper’s motto – “All the News That’s Fit to Print” – which is prominently displayed in the upper-lefthand corner of page one each day, doesn’t extend to boxing. [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    I am happy that the New York Times ignores boxing. American fans ignore American boxers. They degrade them, dehumanize them. You want media boxing coverage? Leave the country. You did it to yourself.

    The one laughs last, laughs best.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Pigeons View Post
      I am happy that the New York Times ignores boxing. American fans ignore American boxers. They degrade them, dehumanize them. You want media boxing coverage? Leave the country. You did it to yourself.

      The one laughs last, laughs best.
      I don't get this statement. Did what to ourselves? I was asked by a co worker the other day if I knew the two guys in the picture that we're standing next to another co worker... It was Mosley and his son... I guess he didn't hear me cuz he points to Mosley's son and says but do you know who that is...

      I'm glad there's a forum filled with guys who enjoy boxing as much as I do, but sad that on Monday's, after a big game and fight, the whole office is decorated in their favorite team's colors, but only a handful will know there was a fight Saturday...

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Pigeons View Post
        I am happy that the New York Times ignores boxing. American fans ignore American boxers. They degrade them, dehumanize them. You want media boxing coverage? Leave the country. You did it to yourself.

        The one laughs last, laughs best.
        what a random post filled with what seems to be extremely sour g****s

        Comment


        • #5
          The times is such a far left, biased reporting paper, always has been all mu years in NYC...much better reading sports in the Post...Every Friday, 2, in the Newark Star Leger, good boxing articles & news...

          Comment


          • #6
            Does anyone under 90 years old really read the NY times

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by nycsmooth View Post
              The times is such a far left, biased reporting paper, always has been all mu years in NYC...much better reading sports in the Post...Every Friday, 2, in the Newark Star Leger, good boxing articles & news...
              If they covered boxing it would probably be an op-ed by some whiney suburbanite titled "Savage bloodsport portrays interracial violence in a positive light" then break off into a rant about oil spills and LGBT
              Last edited by E. O. Wilson; 08-30-2014, 08:25 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                You really can't be too surprised or upset at this news. Compared to other sports, boxers both perform far more infrequently and are less accessible to view than other sports. Boxing may be a wealthy sport (because it hoses its fans) but its still a niche sport and will always be a niche sport.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Infamous View Post
                  I don't get this statement. Did what to ourselves? I was asked by a co worker the other day if I knew the two guys in the picture that we're standing next to another co worker... It was Mosley and his son... I guess he didn't hear me cuz he points to Mosley's son and says but do you know who that is...

                  I'm glad there's a forum filled with guys who enjoy boxing as much as I do, but sad that on Monday's, after a big game and fight, the whole office is decorated in their favorite team's colors, but only a handful will know there was a fight Saturday...
                  I know what he's alluding to, judging from the tone and leaning of his bias that I've observed in his prior posts. To answer your question, he's clearly a card carrying member of TBE's TMT minions...and there's only one boxer documented on the record who was whining and crying about a foreign yellow midget getting more love than he, and was begging for Americans to support him because he represents "the red, white and blue." So, in Pigeon's opinion, the dearth of boxing related news from The NY Times is our karmic justice for sacrilegiously "degrading" and "dehumanizing" America's very own TBE.

                  To me, it seems funny how TBE's minions willfully deny how he brings down that karma on himself because of his attitude and methods of perpetuating the illusion that he's the self-proclaimed "TBE," and that he's above everyone else in "relevance."

                  Anyway, to get back on topic, this article by Thomas Hauser proves once again that he's an outstanding investigative journalist. I know the majority of TMT's minions, if they know who wrote the article, will dismiss or ignore reading what he has to say because of the prior damaging article he did to expose Al Haymon (http://www.boxingscene.com/what-al-h...lanning--79627). So I don't expect to see many comments on this thread from the TMT fan club.

                  'Nuff said.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by SamuraiSam View Post
                    I know what he's alluding to, judging from the tone and leaning of his bias that I've observed in his prior posts. To answer your question, he's clearly a card carrying member of TBE's TMT minions...and there's only one boxer documented on the record who was whining and crying about a foreign yellow midget getting more love than he, and was begging for Americans to support him because he represents "the red, white and blue." So, in Pigeon's opinion, the dearth of boxing related news from The NY Times is our karmic justice for sacrilegiously "degrading" and "dehumanizing" America's very own TBE.

                    To me, it seems funny how TBE's minions willfully deny how he brings down that karma on himself because of his attitude and methods of perpetuating the illusion that he's the self-proclaimed "TBE," and that he's above everyone else in "relevance."

                    Anyway, to get back on topic, this article by Thomas Hauser proves once again that he's an outstanding investigative journalist. I know the majority of TMT's minions, if they know who wrote the article, will dismiss or ignore reading what he has to say because of the prior damaging article he did to expose Al Haymon (http://www.boxingscene.com/what-al-h...lanning--79627). So I don't expect to see many comments on this thread from the TMT fan club.

                    'Nuff said.
                    You talk about TMT fanboys but you are a Hauser ****rider? Hauser doesn't investigate, he just **** ride on rumors and make speculations, I never seen him make a reference of any significance in boxing. Everyone he picked against or wrote against, has proven him wrong.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP