Comments Thread For: WBC Praises Nevada Commission For Gloves Policy

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • New England
    Strong champion.
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2010
    • 37514
    • 1,926
    • 1,486
    • 97,173

    #31
    Originally posted by bigjavi973
    yup just look at my avatar. Cotto with punchers gloves.


    can you imagine what cotto's people would have done if floyd refused to let him use the gloves in the contract ?

    he'd get an 8 figure settlement if the fight didn't go forward.

    Comment

    • New England
      Strong champion.
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2010
      • 37514
      • 1,926
      • 1,486
      • 97,173

      #32
      floyd mayweather and his people bullied maidana into wearing different gloves to gain an advantage. it was a close fight in spite of floyd's advantage. he put a natural puncher with gigantic hands into a foam glove that barely fit.


      glovegate happened. it's a huge scar on floyd's legacy.

      Comment

      • bigjavi973
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2013
        • 24007
        • 759
        • 1,480
        • 1,236,071

        #33
        I would like the floyd fans to answer this:

        Why didn't floyd let maidana use the same NSAC approved red punches gloves that his own stablemates used that very same night?

        Comment

        • big_james10
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2007
          • 6809
          • 319
          • 39
          • 13,287

          #34
          Blah! Blah! Blah! Whine! Whine! Whine! The haters are still talking about the gloves as if the gloves made all the difference in the first Mayweather/Maidana fight. A fighter, if he is good/great, should be able to win with any gloves. ODLH picked Mayweather's gloves for their fight and Mayweather still won the fight. If Maidana was capable of beating Mayweather, he would have done it regardless of the gloves he was wearing.

          "I lost because of the gloves" is about as lame of an excuse as "I lost because my opponent ran during the fight." Both are used by fighters with limited skills.

          Comment

          • Dean_Razorback
            God of Thunder and R n' R
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2013
            • 16556
            • 1,022
            • 395
            • 98,048

            #35
            Originally posted by bigjavi973
            I would like the floyd fans to answer this:

            Why didn't floyd let maidana use the same NSAC approved red punches gloves that his own stablemates used that very same night?
            they won't answer you, somehow they are gonna twist it telling you how much money floyd gets, and how rich he is.

            Comment

            • HanzGruber
              STRAPMEUP
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2011
              • 29824
              • 1,069
              • 238
              • 81,632

              #36
              Originally posted by big_james10
              Blah! Blah! Blah! Whine! Whine! Whine! The haters are still talking about the gloves as if the gloves made all the difference in the first Mayweather/Maidana fight. A fighter, if he is good/great, should be able to win with any gloves. ODLH picked Mayweather's gloves for their fight and Mayweather still won the fight. If Maidana was capable of beating Mayweather, he would have done it regardless of the gloves he was wearing.

              "I lost because of the gloves" is about as lame of an excuse as "I lost because my opponent ran during the fight." Both are used by fighters with limited skills.
              Well PAC blamed the gloves when morales made him wear pillows. So of course all the Floyd haters think gloves make you win fights

              Comment

              • bigjavi973
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2013
                • 24007
                • 759
                • 1,480
                • 1,236,071

                #37
                Originally posted by big_james10
                Blah! Blah! Blah! Whine! Whine! Whine! The haters are still talking about the gloves as if the gloves made all the difference in the first Mayweather/Maidana fight. A fighter, if he is good/great, should be able to win with any gloves. ODLH picked Mayweather's gloves for their fight and Mayweather still won the fight. If Maidana was capable of beating Mayweather, he would have done it regardless of the gloves he was wearing.

                "I lost because of the gloves" is about as lame of an excuse as "I lost because my opponent ran during the fight." Both are used by fighters with limited skills.
                So if the gloves didnt make a difference, why is floyd making a big deal out of it and why are ya floydiots backing him? -

                You still didnt answer my original question.

                Comment

                • mercenario
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Jun 2012
                  • 142
                  • 11
                  • 0
                  • 6,176

                  #38
                  Come on guys, don't be so harsh, now we know that he can't read, he can't read the regs nor he can read domestic violence laws.

                  Comment

                  • MRCHOKEaMF
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 2539
                    • 131
                    • 6
                    • 2,780

                    #39
                    So if two fighters use the same gloves one is at a disadvantage?

                    Comment

                    • mev1
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 279
                      • 48
                      • 318
                      • 7,531

                      #40
                      Originally posted by big_james10
                      Blah! Blah! Blah! Whine! Whine! Whine! The haters are still talking about the gloves as if the gloves made all the difference in the first Mayweather/Maidana fight. A fighter, if he is good/great, should be able to win with any gloves. ODLH picked Mayweather's gloves for their fight and Mayweather still won the fight. If Maidana was capable of beating Mayweather, he would have done it regardless of the gloves he was wearing.

                      "I lost because of the gloves" is about as lame of an excuse as "I lost because my opponent ran during the fight." Both are used by fighters with limited skills.
                      A lot of people thought ODLH Won that fight. But your right, the gloves should not win you a fight, if it is a blow out. but there was a reason Floyd refused the gloves. He knew it might be close, and with softer gloves He had a better chance of winning a decision, and less chance of getting hurt, or stopped. I'm not saying that would happen, because it never has, but less chances. And I believe Floyd feels that He's slipping a little, so why take a chance.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP