Mayweather on 105.1 trying to read

[E. O. Wilson]

Yes, in today's world. Money determines class and education. You fail again.

And yes, top economists did indeed miss predicting the Great Recession. And your best to refute that is 'you dont just know nothing about economics, history or sociology, but you are also destitute in politics.'

No it doesn't.

People who were classier and more educated than you to begin with created monetary systems to benefit from the technology they designed.

Meanwhile the rest of the world were eating their toenails in brush fields.

The idea that money just "happened" and unfairly separated everyone is only promoted by INFERIOR LOSERS.

Most of the people who spend all day whining about class divisions should in reality be extremely grateful that they're even permitted to live or reproduce.

[Masters01]

Yes, in today's world. Money determines class and education. You fail again.

And yes, top economists did indeed miss predicting the Great Recession. And your best to refute that is 'you dont just know nothing about economics, history or sociology, but you are also destitute in politics.'

Ah, I see your original position has been negotiated. You first said (on multiple occassions) that money created class and education, and now you're backtracking to it merely determining class and education. These are of course two very different statements. They're both wrong, but also different.

Why would i refute a baseless proposition? You made the statement, so the onus is on you to justify it. That's how debate and discussion always works - you know, statement, followed by argument, and then followed by counter-argument from the opposition. Youre messing up the sequencing.

[-Kev-]

He is NOT junior gong. jg would have said some corny nickname by now about Floyd.

[Bigg Rigg]

This thread is going to reach 1,000 posts. Lol

[radioraheem]

The only thing I hated about that was listening to classmates read like this:

'Once u-u-u-upon a ti-ti-ti-time th th th there wa wa was three little...'

I would read so fast, I actually had to slow down and dumb my reading down for the class.

Man, don't even get me started on that.

[Masters01]

No it doesn't.

People who were classier and more educated than you to begin with created monetary systems to benefit from the technology they designed.

Meanwhile the rest of the world was eating their toenails in brush field.

The idea that money just "happened" and unfairly separated everyone is only promoted by INFERIOR LOSERS.

Most of the people who spend all day whining about class divisions should in reality be extremely grateful that they're even permitted to live or reproduce.

Yeah, these are really my exact sentiments. The low and uneducated class must come up with justifications as to why they are at the bottom, and these are invariably steeped in misinformation and wishful thinking. This happens all over the world.

When in reality it is because this (life) is all just a game of survival and prosperity of the fittest, and they are simply unfit to occupy higher positions in life.

[E. O. Wilson]

It's nice enough for the producers and inventors to allow the moldy parts of society to fester.

They can't also be expected to water it and keep it warm.

[radioraheem]

Ah, I see your original position has been negotiated. You first said (on multiple occassions) that money created class and education, and now you're backtracking to it merely determining class and education. These are of course two very different statements. They're both wrong, but also different.

Why would i refute a baseless proposition? You made the statement, so the onus is on you to justify it. That's how debate and discussion always works - you know, statement, followed by argument, and then followed by counter-argument from the opposition. Youre messing up the sequencing.

It wasn't negotiated. You're just trying to twist it, but failing hopelessly.

Baseless? The guy who contributes nothing besides spewing random toxic negative statements is talking about how to conduct a debate and discussion properly?

[!! Shawn]

Lol poor, desperate guy grasping at anything. You used the Americanised version, and I used the traditional, English version. Not my fault your family cant afford a plane ticket

The correct term would be anglicized.

[Masters01]

It's nice enough for the producers and inventors to allow the moldy parts of society to fester.

They can't also be expected to water it and keep it warm.

Lol damn. I dont disagree with the principle. Its a shame the west have lost track of this. In all the rising economics (china, india, brazil, mexico, indonesia), they give incredibly little attention to the uneducated classes because they are unproductive, and so their best and brightest can bring in the money uninterruptedly.

Meanwhile ***** sets up initiatives for the poor and taxes the rich. Robin Hood in the new age.