Cotto vs Trout 2

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bigg Rigg
    The People's Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2013
    • 11387
    • 280
    • 58
    • 20,735

    #11
    Originally posted by BrushMyHair
    Trout is too slick for Cotto.

    What Cotto Fans Say

    But He has Roach Now.

    What I say: A Quote From Dwayne Johnson. "It Doesn't Matter If He Has Roach Now!!!!!!!!!!!!"

    I really think Cotto just slept on Trout. He would probably beat him in a rematch. F*cl him though.

    Comment

    • Dr Rumack
      I Also Cook
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Oct 2012
      • 11870
      • 683
      • 303
      • 22,101

      #12
      Can't see Cotto wanting anything to do with Trout. He was dominated in the second half of that fight.

      Comment

      • _original_
        Dinamita
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jul 2009
        • 17838
        • 1,872
        • 789
        • 67,167

        #13
        I think Cotto would win a rematch, I honestly had the first a close win for Trout (7-5), not the "schooling" people like to make out to be now. Miguel with Roach in his corner and a better game plan (attack the body more + counter) would get the win over Trout.

        Comment

        • Yogi007
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Jul 2011
          • 758
          • 16
          • 106
          • 6,944

          #14
          I don't care to see him fight Trout. I really don't care to see Trout or Lara fights again. They aren't even FNF worthy and there is no way they should be seen anywhere on a PPV card.

          Comment

          • boliodogs
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2008
            • 33358
            • 824
            • 1,782
            • 309,589

            #15
            I would be against it because Cotto is the world middleweight champ now and has a responsibility to defend that title against top rated middleweights. Trout has no ranking at middleweight and the guy he is fighting is ranked about number 70 at 154 by boxrec. If Trout becomes a top 10 middleweight or Cotto were no longer middleweight champ then I would like the fight and pick Trout to win a close one again.

            Comment

            • Beater_of_ass
              male ass that is
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2009
              • 7172
              • 281
              • 144
              • 13,666

              #16
              Originally posted by $BloodyNate$
              Am I the only one who thinks Cotto would take it too Trout right now? Trout had Cotto fighting backwards for god sake. It was a close fight that Cotto loss by letting Trout out work him and dictate the pace.

              Roach would never let Cotto fight backwards against Trout and this is fact. With the jab and left hook to the liver I think Cotto could take Trout in the rematch. A lot of people think Cotto was dominated because they couldn't believe how good Trout looked but it was a really close fight that Trout won by being more active, not because he was slick. Floyd was slick vs Cotto. Trout just outgunned a Cotto who took him lightly.
              I agree. Cotto looked like **** even before he got in the ring, he was bloated and I think he simply wasn't up for that fight coming off a fight with Floyd. He overlooked Trout and had a terribly hard training camp (tons of sparring and 8 mile runs daily.) He still didn't do terrible in that fight, he lost but in a rematch I think he takes it to Trout. I would prefer to see it over Andy Lee that's for sure.

              Comment

              • boliodogs
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2008
                • 33358
                • 824
                • 1,782
                • 309,589

                #17
                Originally posted by BrushMyHair
                The Golovkin fight needs to be made. GGG needs Cotto to get him on the right track to stardom.
                The Cotto vs. GGG fight should be made but Cotto must agree to the fight and I doubt he ever will. He fought Trout before because Trout had a world title and Cotto wanted his title. Cotto won't fight Trout now because Trout doesn't bring in much money.

                Comment

                • NAPO
                  Business are Unfinish
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 7477
                  • 262
                  • 292
                  • 14,922

                  #18
                  I would really like for Cotto to try and avenge that loss. He was far from dominated in that fight, but he also clearly lost the fight (Solid 7-5 for Trout)

                  I always wonder why people thought that was a dominating performance by Trout.

                  Comment

                  • NormC
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 357
                    • 19
                    • 21
                    • 7,308

                    #19
                    There's nothing in it for Cotto to fight Trout besides avenging a lost...no money in it and that's what he is fighting for.

                    Comment

                    • J-champ
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • May 2005
                      • 10493
                      • 1,641
                      • 906
                      • 18,037

                      #20
                      Cotto has to get past Lee first but he should want revenge.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP