Floyd Mayweather vs Shawn Porter - Who you got?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Big Dunn
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 69275
    • 9,488
    • 7,834
    • 287,568

    #41
    Originally posted by LacedUp
    And add to that Maidana punches a lot harder than Porter, which is of course a must have if you're trying to do good work when you have a fighter against the ropes.
    I don't know about harder, but he does mix in wild "home run" shots with a few efficient and effective jabs/overhand shots. Porter is much sloppier, which is saying something.

    Comment

    • Check_hooks
      The Don of NSB
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Feb 2010
      • 12099
      • 966
      • 1,875
      • 25,959

      #42
      Originally posted by LacedUp
      You said that about the Brook fight too.
      I never said Brook had no power

      I questioned his chin and lack of experience fighting world level competition

      And he clearly lost against Porter imo but thats besides the point

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #43
        Always thought it was an easy win for Mayweather. Especially with random drug testing.

        Comment

        • Uncle Rodge
          Rigotard
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2010
          • 2042
          • 259
          • 467
          • 12,316

          #44
          Originally posted by New England
          styles make fights. i think brook does better against porter than 37 year old mayweather does.

          after seeing the brook fight for porter, you obviously take mayweather. that said, the style of porter is better suited for brook, who was tall and strong enough to handle porter in the clinches.


          if maidana has mayweather on the ropes, it's a good bet that porter gets him there too.



          i also want to add that i'm allowing brits to enjoy their win. brook is a good fighter, and he pulled off a great win. i'm not going to mention yet that you're all now fans of the andre ward style of boxing, because that MFER brook freaking clinches.


          next time ward is out, celebrate him. he does what brook did on a much higher level, and he's a less prolific clincher. brook tied a man up and walked him to the ropes, hoping for a break. ward walks a man to the ropes with the intent to work. there's a difference. i'm not saying that i flag eithe rman for it, i just want to make sure it is recognized.

          in time, i'll address it furhter. as i've said, i do want the brits to enjoy their win. they don't get them too often on this level.
          If there's one thing the British people love, it's being patronised by a self deluded yank.

          We appreciate you giving us the time to enjoy Kell's win. I mean, it was really in the balance straight after the fight but now we've received your official commendation; the whole country has taken a palpable sigh of relief. You can really feel it in the air.

          Ward gets mad love in this country. Do you get your information from boxrec?

          Comment

          • John Locke
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2013
            • 7818
            • 411
            • 287
            • 40,060

            #45
            Porter would give Floyd a very tough fight. Floyd doesn't have the strength to hold/clinch Porter cleanly, Porter would get some work done on the inside. Also Floyd doesn't have a strong jab like Brook or even as much power as Brook, who isn't a big puncher. So he will find it hard to earn Porter's respect.

            I would still pick Floyd to win, but it would be a tough, competitive fight. People on here are too reactionary. A fighter loses a fight and suddenly he's a bum and his past wins don't count for anything. People on here were saying Porter would struggle against Collazo yesterday. Ridiculous.

            Comment

            • boliodogs
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2008
              • 33358
              • 824
              • 1,782
              • 309,589

              #46
              Mayeather by a wide ud. Porter is actually easier to hit when he charges in than Maidana is and Mayweather will hit him hard and often when he rushes in. Thten Mayweather will either tie him up or out fight him at close range.

              Comment

              • VG_Addict
                king meat's twin
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jun 2012
                • 5618
                • 237
                • 3
                • 53,380

                #47
                Floyd wins easily. Porter lunges when he punches. A counter-puncher would have a field day with him.

                And LOL @ the guy who said Floyd doesn't have a good jab. He has a good jab when he uses it, like he did against Marquez, Hatton, and Canelo.

                Comment

                • LacedUp
                  Still Smokin'
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 29171
                  • 781
                  • 381
                  • 132,163

                  #48
                  Originally posted by The Big Dunn
                  I don't know about harder, but he does mix in wild "home run" shots with a few efficient and effective jabs/overhand shots. Porter is much sloppier, which is saying something.
                  I think Maidana punches harder and he's also got a higher KO ratio against a little better opposition i'd say. He also has better punching technique.

                  Originally posted by Check_hooks
                  I never said Brook had no power

                  I questioned his chin and lack of experience fighting world level competition

                  And he clearly lost against Porter imo but thats besides the point
                  No you said the Brook-Porter fight would be similar to Malignaggi-Porter.

                  Why can't you just admit Brook won? Porter didn't land one clean shot all night, how is he supposed to win?

                  Comment

                  • Resilient
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Apr 2014
                    • 2888
                    • 175
                    • 123
                    • 3,263

                    #49
                    Bad style match up for Floyd, there's a reason why the Floboners disliked Porter so much.

                    Comment

                    • Bushbaby
                      Wild Apache
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 23514
                      • 727
                      • 370
                      • 32,078

                      #50
                      You simply cannot assume a fighter loses to another he's never fought because a totally different fighter beat him. And you cannot develop amnesia at your own bequest to do so. Marcus Maidana recently gave Floyd hell. Porter is everything plus more that Maidana had to offer and Floyd is old.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP