80% of boxing media score for Brook over Porter

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fightscore
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Dec 2011
    • 401
    • 27
    • 0
    • 6,574

    #1

    80% of boxing media score for Brook over Porter

    The high number surprised me although as the you will see on the article the ave score was close. I scored it 114-114.

    The 117-111 score i feel is far too wide.

    so how did you all score the fight?

    here is the article with all the scores...... http://www.boxingnewsonline.net/nine...st-kell-brook/
  • SeekDaGreat
    Da' Hood Legend
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2013
    • 9393
    • 341
    • 1,105
    • 19,147

    #2
    Porter did rough up work. His stuff was mainly ineffective imo. I had Brook up by atleast 3 rounds.

    Comment

    • The Big Dunn
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 70570
      • 10,102
      • 8,298
      • 287,568

      #3
      feels right to me. I had 117-111 as well. I thought brook was in total control the whole fight.

      Comment

      • LacedUp
        Still Smokin'
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 29171
        • 781
        • 381
        • 132,163

        #4
        116-112 or 117-111 I'm fine with both.

        Comment

        • bojangles1987
          bo jungle
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2009
          • 41118
          • 1,326
          • 357
          • 63,028

          #5
          Ciaran Gibbons (Freelance) : 117-113 Porter
          Boxing Philosopher : 116-112 Porter
          Johnathan Mitrosky (LaceUpBoxing) : 116-112 Porter

          I think these guys should actually try watching the fight next time.

          Comment

          • gmc_rfc_06
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Oct 2010
            • 9486
            • 282
            • 131
            • 16,947

            #6
            116-112 Brook.

            Can't see it being any closer, Brook was in control.

            Comment

            • Beercules
              Lounge POTY '17
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Aug 2013
              • 65186
              • 4,941
              • 7,203
              • 950,179

              #7
              Porter won 4 rounds tops.

              Comment

              • The Big Dunn
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2009
                • 70570
                • 10,102
                • 8,298
                • 287,568

                #8
                Originally posted by Beercules
                Porter won 4 rounds tops.
                you say that now. if he signs to fight manny then you will change and have him winning 116-112.

                Comment

                • Willthethrill
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Aug 2013
                  • 788
                  • 25
                  • 12
                  • 8,248

                  #9
                  I'm just curious as to how anyone had porter ahead

                  Comment

                  • Bigg Rigg
                    The People's Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jan 2013
                    • 11387
                    • 280
                    • 58
                    • 20,735

                    #10
                    Originally posted by fightscore
                    the high number surprised me although as the you will see on the article the ave score was close. I scored it 114-114.

                    The 117-111 score i feel is far too wide.

                    So how did you all score the fight?

                    Here is the article with all the scores...... http://www.boxingnewsonline.net/nine...st-kell-brook/
                    8-4. 116-112.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP