Should Khan and Brook Be considered the number 2 and 3 147 pounders today?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Larry the boss
    EDUCATED
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2011
    • 90798
    • 6,419
    • 4,473
    • 2,500,480

    #71
    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
    Because Kell Brook has announced himself on the world stage. The fight now means something worldwide. Before last night, it only meant something in the UK. Khan might as well have fought Frankie Gavin - it would have had the same significance worldwide.

    Khan has said for years that Brook needs to prove himself against a world class fighter. He said on Ringside go fight Maidana or Alexander or Bradley - none of them have belts. It would have had the same impact - the belt is secondary.
    no it is for the IBF title..Khan even said it....http://www.boxingscene.com/amir-khan...nothing--81063

    Comment

    • Larry the boss
      EDUCATED
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2011
      • 90798
      • 6,419
      • 4,473
      • 2,500,480

      #72
      why are you trying to flip stuff man??? You posted in the thread where he said"WITHOUT THE IBF TITLE BROOK IS MEANINGLESS".. i even bumped the thread

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #73
        Originally posted by LarryXXX
        no it is for the IBF title..Khan even said it....http://www.boxingscene.com/amir-khan...nothing--81063
        So you think if Brook beat someone like Tim Bradley, Khan would say "Oh but you didn't win the IBF belt"

        Good lord

        Comment

        • Larry the boss
          EDUCATED
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2011
          • 90798
          • 6,419
          • 4,473
          • 2,500,480

          #74
          Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
          So you think if Brook beat someone like Tim Bradley, Khan would say "Oh but you didn't win the IBF belt"

          Good lord
          So now you are flipping what the man said himself??? He is fighting Brook for a title..that is why he wants the fight..he wants a title

          Comment

          • Dirk Diggler UK
            Deleted
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 48836
            • 1,312
            • 693
            • 58,902

            #75
            Originally posted by LarryXXX
            why are you trying to flip stuff man??? You posted in the thread where he said"WITHOUT THE IBF TITLE BROOK IS MEANINGLESS".. i even bumped the thread
            Yeah....i.e if he loses to Porter, the fight is meaningless.

            Khan was looking at Guerrero or Alexander. They don't have belts. Stop living in a fantasy world. The belt is a bonus more than anything.

            Comment

            • Larry the boss
              EDUCATED
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2011
              • 90798
              • 6,419
              • 4,473
              • 2,500,480

              #76
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
              Yeah....i.e if he loses to Porter, the fight is meaningless.

              Khan was looking at Guerrero or Alexander. They don't have belts. Stop living in a fantasy world. The belt is a bonus more than anything.
              I see you will flip this everytime to fit whatever agenda you have..so enjoy your night

              Comment

              • Dirk Diggler UK
                Deleted
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 48836
                • 1,312
                • 693
                • 58,902

                #77
                Originally posted by LarryXXX
                I see you will flip this everytime to fit whatever agenda you have..so enjoy your night
                What agenda you clown? If Brook went and beat Bradley or Maidana, do you think Khan would say "Well you didn't win the IBF title so no fight"

                Answer the question.

                Stop ***ing romanticising about belts and ****.

                Comment

                • SeekDaGreat
                  Da' Hood Legend
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2013
                  • 9393
                  • 341
                  • 1,105
                  • 19,147

                  #78
                  Originally posted by LarryXXX
                  Well it is what it is man..a fight with a title on the line means more then one without it..
                  Yeah. It would be a title fight no matter who it is. Floyd has titles, so it should be the next best fighter in line.

                  Comment

                  • lets rumble
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Jun 2010
                    • 663
                    • 805
                    • 1,207
                    • 11,302

                    #79
                    they might be ranked no 2 and no 3 @ 147 in england

                    Comment

                    • R_Walken
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Dec 2012
                      • 5932
                      • 340
                      • 789
                      • 57,069

                      #80
                      Kell isn't #2, Khan isn't anywhere near #3

                      Personally with that win I got Brook in the 5-6 range , Khan at 10-12.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP