Should Khan and Brook Be considered the number 2 and 3 147 pounders today?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #61
    Originally posted by LarryXXX
    Brook got that belt....Floyd has 2 fights left after this and could UNIFY WITH ANOTHER CHAMPION
    Originally posted by LarryXXX
    That is all he has been doing is collecting belts lately in case you haven't noticed..he is at the end of his career and trying to get his world title total up..Khan is pointless and irrelevant..
    "A belt don't define me. All belts do is collect dust" - Floyd Mayweather Jr

    Mayweather gives a *** about belts now? LOL....the dude who wasn't arsed about Mosley's belt and said he'd easily give up the belt that Pac was mandatory for.

    Like I said, when you're ready to talk realistically, let me know kid.

    Comment

    • Larry the boss
      EDUCATED
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2011
      • 90798
      • 6,419
      • 4,473
      • 2,500,480

      #62
      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
      "A belt don't define me. All belts do is collect dust" - Floyd Mayweather Jr

      Mayweather gives a *** about belts now? LOL....the dude who wasn't arsed about Mosley's belt and said he'd easily give up the belt that Pac was mandatory for.

      Like I said, when you're ready to talk realistically, let me know kid.
      Why did Khan turn Brook down at first??? why does he want to fight him now?

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #63
        Originally posted by Bushbaby
        Not according to dirk. Who said Khan has several more than Brook's. But Brook's means nothing while championing Khan's several. Then He talked about Khan ducking 5 million only to turn around and say now Khan has something to fight Brook for. (Which can only be Brook's belt), lol.
        You clearly didn't comprehend what I was saying. A belt doesn't mean anything to someone who has won several. Big fights are what means something. A big fight can happen with or without a belt. Not hard to understand.

        Khan didn't have a belt and Brook wanted to fight him. His promoter was willing to put up $5m for a fight with no belt. I wonder why.

        Belts doe!

        Comment

        • SeekDaGreat
          Da' Hood Legend
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2013
          • 9393
          • 341
          • 1,105
          • 19,147

          #64
          Originally posted by LarryXXX
          well he has been fighting the best man..same can be said about Manny he is fighting a 140 pounder next who isn't even a top 140 pounder
          I'm just saying, at this point it shouldn't be about petty belts if there is a better fight to be made. That goes for anyone with Floyd like credentials. Manny included.

          Comment

          • Bushbaby
            Wild Apache
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2008
            • 23513
            • 727
            • 370
            • 32,078

            #65
            Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
            You clearly didn't comprehend what I was saying. A belt doesn't mean anything to someone who has won several. Big fights are what means something. A big fight can happen with or without a belt. Not hard to understand.

            Khan didn't have a belt and Brook wanted to fight him. His promoter was willing to put up $5m for a fight with no belt. I wonder why.

            Belts doe!

            And yet Khan didn"t fight for 5 million.

            Comment

            • Larry the boss
              EDUCATED
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2011
              • 90798
              • 6,419
              • 4,473
              • 2,500,480

              #66
              Dirk...belts dont matter?? yet you have a picture of Brook in your avy with a belt he just won???

              Comment

              • Larry the boss
                EDUCATED
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2011
                • 90798
                • 6,419
                • 4,473
                • 2,500,480

                #67
                Originally posted by Bushbaby
                And yet Khan didn"t fight for 5 million.
                but he wants to fight Brook now why???? FOR THE BELT... why is he acting like this sin't the reason??? Khan even said without the belt the fight was worthless himself

                Comment

                • Bushbaby
                  Wild Apache
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 23513
                  • 727
                  • 370
                  • 32,078

                  #68
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                  You clearly didn't comprehend what I was saying. A belt doesn't mean anything to someone who has won several. Big fights are what means something. A big fight can happen with or without a belt. Not hard to understand.

                  Khan didn't have a belt and Brook wanted to fight him. His promoter was willing to put up $5m for a fight with no belt. I wonder why.

                  Belts doe!
                  I understand everything you posted, the thing is I don"t think you do.

                  Comment

                  • Larry the boss
                    EDUCATED
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 90798
                    • 6,419
                    • 4,473
                    • 2,500,480

                    #69
                    Originally posted by SeekDaGreat
                    I'm just saying, at this point it shouldn't be about petty belts if there is a better fight to be made. That goes for anyone with Floyd like credentials. Manny included.
                    Well it is what it is man..a fight with a title on the line means more then one without it..

                    Comment

                    • Dirk Diggler UK
                      Deleted
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 48836
                      • 1,312
                      • 693
                      • 58,902

                      #70
                      Originally posted by LarryXXX
                      Why did Khan turn Brook down at first??? why does he want to fight him now?
                      Because Kell Brook has announced himself on the world stage. The fight now means something worldwide. Before last night, it only meant something in the UK. Khan might as well have fought Frankie Gavin - it would have had the same significance worldwide.

                      Khan has said for years that Brook needs to prove himself against a world class fighter. He said on Ringside go fight Maidana or Alexander or Bradley - none of them have belts. It would have had the same impact - the belt is secondary.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP