That was Porter's fault. Brook came to box. Porter was trying to make the Raiders roster.
LMAO. True.
Originally posted by ea22
"75% of the blame on Porter", yep you are not biased at all.
I didn't even care who won tonight. I'm calling it how I see it. What's Brook supposed to do while he's fighting a guy that doesn't fight like any normal boxer. He fights like a spas that didn't take his pills. Porter would've done that to anyone at WW.
It's a garbage fight. Both are one-dimensional. One can't fight on the outside, which is understandable, he's too short. The other can't fight on the inside. He didn't even try, not even once. He preferred to clinch all the way to the end.
That's how ugly that fight was, and they booed at the end. God, that was dreadful to the eyes.
I put 75% of the blame on Porter.
Porter fought the same style that he used to defeat Alexander and Malignaggi and fans liked it then. Brook was the one who held 30 times per round. If you are going to pass around blame, they each deserve 50 percent of it.
Comment