Originally posted by Suavecito80
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Was Canelo-Lopez almost as bad as Garcia-Salka?
Collapse
-
-
Both fights are equally bad. Lopez had as much of a chance to beat Canelo as Salka did beating Garcia. That is all that needs to be said about both of the fights.
Comment
-
-
SAlka was worse. Lopez had just crack ortiz jaw and had fought much better opossition and people actaully knew who he was. The only people who knew salka was hes fmaily
Comment
-
It wasn't as bad, but it was close which is what I voted for. Lopez "beat" Ortiz but that is only because Ortiz quit, he was up on all the scorecards. In essence Ortiz was beating that ass until he got caught, Lopez didn't look good in winning that fight. While the fight was at 147 it was Lopez only fight at 147 and then he had to jump up again to 154 to face Canelo. No one had heard of Lopez (at least I hadn't) until he even fought Ortiz so... no not as bad, but pretty damn close. Neither fight should have taken place to be honest.
Comment
-
Lopez also had an arguable win over Jesse Vargas. So yeah, Lopez is a much more proven fighter than Salka. It really isn't comparable.
Comment
-
A shit fight is a shit fight. We shouldn't start ranking these shit fights by level of shittiness because none of them should have happened, PERIOD. All shit fights are created equally and we as fans need to do something about it.
Comment
Comment