It's not a triangle theory, it was a measuring stick against a similar opponent. Trout was a bad loss, but Canelo only did slightly better against Trout it wasn't like Cotto didn't win a round in that fight. He won at least 3 or 4 rounds minimum in that fight, Canelo won what 3 more? Cotto is also obviously a better fight than he showed in the Trout fight while Canelo hasn't improved at all since Mayweather. It may not even be his fault, he obviously works hard but maybe he should stop the HS diploma and change teachers going for that PhD.
Canelo I think is simply too slow on his feet, and while he is a big guy he doesn't have the best stamina. He fights at a steady pace and that favors Cotto, Cotto also likes to work at a steady pace, but he is better at ring generalship, has much more experience and is excellent at keeping the other fighter off rhythm. He is also the better boxer and just better overall, even being the older fighter. Canelo has a few things going for him as well such as being bigger, possibly more punching power and a better chin. I'm still going with Cotto, skills pay the bills and size isn't everything as Cotto showed against Martinez.
Canelo I think is simply too slow on his feet, and while he is a big guy he doesn't have the best stamina. He fights at a steady pace and that favors Cotto, Cotto also likes to work at a steady pace, but he is better at ring generalship, has much more experience and is excellent at keeping the other fighter off rhythm. He is also the better boxer and just better overall, even being the older fighter. Canelo has a few things going for him as well such as being bigger, possibly more punching power and a better chin. I'm still going with Cotto, skills pay the bills and size isn't everything as Cotto showed against Martinez.
Comment