Tweet
My advice to Porter is: If you get an offer to fight Marquez this year...take the fight! I'm a fan of Thurman, but JMM brings way more exposure, and much less risk. JMM has only beaten Pacquiao at 147, and no one else.
-
-
Porter will beat Brook but the next 1 is the problem: Who?? mayb FM next year, JMM will not fight this year, & that leaves Keith. IMO ko will win in an exciting fight, he has more versatility than Porter, but can Porter's people make the match, & does Keith, as interim WBA want it....lotta mayb.s out there...Comment
-
Most of you have an unrealistic idea that Porter is a champion with a belt. So what you are saying is that a fighter with a belt NEEDS to beat Brooks and Thurman to get a shot at Mayweather? Either party doesnt have a real belt, but they are suppose to be a stepping stone to a megafight with Money Mayweather? Are you kidding me?Comment
-
I hope Porter doesn't take it too hard when our kid Kell "All of the lights" Brook proper fookin sparks him right out lad.Comment
-
Aint no way he beats Brook!
Shawn Porter is an overrated buck toothed jive bunny **** who couldn't whup Haroon Khan, nevermind Brook.
You all make me laugh bigging up this donkey kong toothed ****. All he's good for is a trip to the dentist to file down those Stonehenge rocks in his mooey.
Fat, useless buck toothed jerry curl **** head.Comment
-
Originally posted by Box Up! View Post
I don't know you and never saw you but I'm sure of one thing. Based on your post, you are nothing but an ugly and good for nothing bum fantasizing to be a good looking and the the best boxer out there.Comment
-
It's quite the opposite. If you are too impressive against Brook, you move further away from a Mayweather fight.Comment
-
That is actually a good idea and the Marquez camp has shown interest in that fightOriginally posted by Bronx2245 View PostComment
-
Brooks hasn't done anything so I don't see how it helps or hinders PorterComment
-
Khan should fight the winner of Porter-Brook.
Winner fights Floyd.Comment
Comment