Trout won the first fight 11-1. Trout fought a tough Lara and got robbed by a game Canelo. Cotto fought a shot Delvin, and a shot Sergio. Trout has been tested more. Roach makes no difference. Cotto is not a test for trout.
Are we forgetting that Trout is an Al Haymon fighter?
It's not happening.
I don't see why Haymon would object to Trout fighting Cotto. If they make the fight at 155, Trout could challenge for the belt. I don't see why Haymon wouldn't push for an opportunity like that. Trout is useless right now.
I don't see why Haymon would object to Trout fighting Cotto. If they make the fight at 155, Trout could challenge for the belt. I don't see why Haymon wouldn't push for an opportunity like that. Trout is useless right now.
Trout won the first fight 11-1. Trout fought a tough Lara and got robbed by a game Canelo. Cotto fought a shot Delvin, and a shot Sergio. Trout has been tested more. Roach makes no difference. Cotto is not a test for trout.
LOL stop this ridiculous nonsense about robberies already! No one was robbed against Canelo. Nor Trout neither Lara. Both were tight fights no way that they were robberies and the majority of the boxing fans actually think that Canelo won both fight so stop tell this robbery bull**** over and over again and get over that Canelo won both fight by narrow decision though I guess you really wanted to see him lose and get schooled like against Mayweather.
Comment