Geale is ****, that is the truth!

[RAV3N]

What is even funnier is that Daniel Geale has done more as a pro fighter then Rakhim Chakhkiev.

I doubt that Rakhim will become a unified champ, he is having difficulties becoming just a normal wold champ.

So that makes Rakhim worse then ***** by your standards.

[dan_cov]

Rakhim has in fact done near to nothing as a pro fighter and he is your favorite fighter.

He fights at cw which is a weak division and still hasnt become a world champ.

Yet you say that GGG, someone that is cleaning out a division isnt a good fighter?

On one hand like a guy who has only knocked sub-standard opposition but you dont like someone who is at the top of their division.

Why are you turning this thread into a thread about Rakhim? Who fought a legitimate top flight world champion in only his 16th pro fight. Diablo is ten times the fighter Geale is. He is the CW equivalent of a Tony Bellew.

The CW division is not weak. Chakhkiev, Huck, Diablo, Drozd, Mchunu, Makabu, Hernandez, Usyk etc, a weak division? Seriously? Its a real murderers row compared to most divisions let alone middleweight with your Solimans, Geales, Fletchers of the world making noise.

There is nothing to clean out. Quillin has no balls, Cotto isn't interested, outside of that there is nobody and the only guy who is interesting, HBO are rejecting. Why doesn't he just move up?
He can beat 10 Fletchers, Geales, *****'s, he is wasting his career.
He wants big paydays, big names then he knows what he has to do.
Or stay at middleweight and keep beating unknown journeymen and guys you rate highly because he is Australian.

Beaten a 40yr old Mundane who just got obliterated by Clottey, sc****d by a 40yr old Sturm who everyone and their grandmother has beaten lately. Beat Garth ''from the hood'' Wood. Definitely a top 5 world class fighter! Total monster.

[dan_cov]

If Rakhim was in a division filled with guys like Geale, Fletcher, Chudnov, Stevens quality fighters he'd walk through the whole lot with severe ease just like GGG has. Just like any half decent fighter would do.

MW is full of duds. Look who Geale won his titles from a shot to pieces 40yr old Roman Karmazin who was a light middleweight and never beat anyone of note.
A 40yr old Sturm who arguably just lost to Macklin & Murray

Geale is not a world class fighter he was just in the right place at the right time.

[US Dirk Killer]

Why are you turning this thread into a thread about Rakhim? Who fought a legitimate top flight world champion in only his 16th pro fight. Diablo is ten times the fighter Geale is. He is the CW equivalent of a Tony Bellew.

The CW division is not weak. Chakhkiev, Huck, Diablo, Drozd, Mchunu, Makabu, Hernandez, Usyk etc, a weak division? Seriously? Its a real murderers row compared to most divisions let alone middleweight with your Solimans, Geales, Fletchers of the world making noise.

There is nothing to clean out. Quillin has no balls, Cotto isn't interested, outside of that there is nobody and the only guy who is interesting, HBO are rejecting. Why doesn't he just move up?
He can beat 10 Fletchers, Geales, *****'s, he is wasting his career.
He wants big paydays, big names then he knows what he has to do.
Or stay at middleweight and keep beating unknown journeymen and guys you rate highly because he is Australian.

Beaten a 40yr old Mundane who just got obliterated by Clottey, sc****d by a 40yr old Sturm who everyone and their grandmother has beaten lately. Beat Garth ''from the hood'' Wood. Definitely a top 5 world class fighter! Total monster.

Good ole dan... always talking up people, then tearing them down after they lose. It seems you almost hate Geale as much as Golovkin. Would seem you'd win and be happy no matter who lost in the fight.

Enough examples have been posted about you building up GGG opponents then calling them crap afterwards.... Geale's turn

Those are two solid fighters we should know this by now with Macklin also going on to give Sergio one of his toughest fights in years.
Sturm has very underrated boxing ability though hes often dragged into a brawl.

Geale on the other hand struggled with shot boxers like Slyvester, guys Sturm completely schooled when at their very best. Geales down in every other fight (credit for getting up & winning)

Whilst Sturm struggled with 2 borderline top 10 legit Middleweights, Geale is getting dropped & has struggled throughout his career with journeyman with 10% K.O ratios. He isn't in Sturms league & frankly not many are.

[pesticid]

Good ole dan... always talking up people, then tearing them down after they lose. It seems you almost hate Geale as much as Golovkin. Would seem you'd win and be happy no matter who lost in the fight.

Enough examples have been posted about you building up GGG opponents then calling them crap afterwards.... Geale's turn

Dan is a known idiot. He's blind with prejudice, I'm surprised he still follows the likes of GGG.

But you sir are turning into an idiot yourself with your constant blabbering about Froch, Ward and GGG.

Get your obsessive-complusiveness under control already.

[dan_cov]

Good ole dan... always talking up people, then tearing them down after they lose. It seems you almost hate Geale as much as Golovkin. Would seem you'd win and be happy no matter who lost in the fight.

Enough examples have been posted about you building up GGG opponents then calling them crap afterwards.... Geale's turn

You went through my post history and all you could find to try prove a point was me shredding Geale and saying Sturm was once a good fighter which he was, years ago! Times change! Sturm isn't half the fighter he was even when I posted that.

Why didn't you post the others instead of nitpicking?

Pre Barker fight;

GGG knocks him clean out inside a few rounds. Very much doubt Geale beats Barker anyway.

Yeah I think he'll edge out a reasonably close decision in a surprisingly good fight. I don't think there is an awful lot to separate them but for me Barkers the little bit bigger, little bit better all round. Slight edge in speed & power.
Not a lot separates them though for me. I can't count Geale out as he has shown time and time again he can come back from the brink of defeat. I think GGG would walk right through Geale though, just too much firepower & I couldn't see Geale being able to keep him honest, hes not the most mobile guy either.

Glass jaw list

Jason Litzau
Enzo Maccarinelli
Amir Khan (can add to the glass neck list too)
James Kirkland
Allan Green
Daniel Geale
Henry Lundy

Sure there are many, many more you avoided too before singling out a post from 2+ years back when Sturm actually still seemed to have something left in the tank

[US Dirk Killer]

Or like when you thought Gabe Rosado had a chance and just ripped him afterwards?

Then macklin was decent... before you also ripped him to pieces.

[dan_cov]

Yes I picked Sturm to beat Geale, I didn't realise he was quite that far gone.
He just lost twice straight after to Sam Soliman lol

Tells you all you need to know as to where Sturm was when he met Geale

[artfuL_]

Feel sorry for you mate, always having to spew your miserable negative opinions which hold zero weight. Geale is a solid fighter and it's disappointing that armchair fans like yourself have to take pathetic shots at him.

[dan_cov]

Or like when you thought Gabe Rosado had a chance and just ripped him afterwards?

Then macklin was decent... before you also ripped him to pieces.

Rosado vs GGG

Voted GGG by decision.

Nowhere did I pick Macklin to win either and saying Macklin is better than the bums GGG had faced prior was nothing but the truth.
Macklins not great but quite solid and probably, almost undoubtably in my mind his best win.