Personally I wouldn't put my money on Bruce Lee vs. a Mixed Martial Artist like a prime Anderson Silva or Jon Jones but I think he has a better shot of beating elite Boxers because their training is limited to punching.
I've been giving my opinion throughout this thread. You're being extremely defensive and unreasonable.
On both accounts we have to rely on the person's testimony and nothing more. There's no video of Bruce Lee in a real fight with anyone so there's no concrete evidence either way, not for Flane Walker and not for Bob Wall or Jim Kelly. Flane would be easy to dismiss if not for the connections he mentioned. He gave us his contact information, people he knew, magazines he interviewed in, a time and place for when he knew Bruce Lee all of which can be investigated and falsified if he's lying. That doesn't mean he's telling the truth about hitting Bruce Lee in sparring but he hasn't been refuted.
Can you post some?
That's not true at all. I have listened to Jim Kelly's interviews and have a lot of respect for him. In one interview he called Bruce Lee the Michael Jordan of sparring. Beyond Jordan in his opinion. He says he sought out Bruce Lee for instruction and was very impressed with him. I find him to be credible.
I've never seen him say Bruce Lee was untouchable only that he disputed claims he ever said that he could kick Bruce Lee's ass and said he believed that no one at the time could do so. I believe based on these observations that Bruce Lee most have been a great fighter.
But here's the thing. No matter how many people vouch for you talk is talk and action is action. No one is untouchable especially against elite competition. As I said things like durability, fight IQ and heart matter in a fight and Bruce Lee was never tested in those areas, not in a fight we can observe. His athleticism, skill and knowledge we can all readily observe from his demonstrations and movies. There are legitimate question marks about his fighting ability.
Got a source? I looked it up and one of the top results was a Boxingscene thread where you made the same claim in 2009. A source would be appreciated.
When have I ever denied Bruce? All I have done in this thread is defend him on verifiable information and ask for sources on information that doesn't currently have any. Again I'm a Bruce Lee fan. I'm trying to be as objective as possible here out of respect for Bruce Lee and that means defending arguments I believe to be valid and being skeptical of claims when I find them questionable. I haven't denied anything. You are so fanatical that you scold and insult fellow Bruce Lee fans just because they may say things that you don't like. The one being unreasonable here is you.
Yes, so what if Skipper hasn't seen Lee fight bigger men? Skipper has fought bigger men, and he thinks Lee would beat anyone. But we know by now, what Skipper thinks or any world class fighter thinks about Bruce lee isn't going to help you come to a conclusion if Bruce could beat an elite boxer in a street fight. You sit on the fence don't you, you haven't really got an opinion have you on anything?
See, you are just being unfair to Bruce. Whenever Bruce is called into question, he delivers. People have witnessed Bruce being phenomenal against world class fighters. No body witnessed Flane. So you can hardly say its like for like now can you?
There are photos of Jim Kelly watching Bruce spar with Bob Wall.
Jim Kelly has said Lee is untouchable and nobody could beat Bruce in his era. The fact that you don't listen or want to ignore as best as you can Jim Kellys comments, I don't think we need to discuss him any further.
I've never seen him say Bruce Lee was untouchable only that he disputed claims he ever said that he could kick Bruce Lee's ass and said he believed that no one at the time could do so. I believe based on these observations that Bruce Lee most have been a great fighter.
But here's the thing. No matter how many people vouch for you talk is talk and action is action. No one is untouchable especially against elite competition. As I said things like durability, fight IQ and heart matter in a fight and Bruce Lee was never tested in those areas, not in a fight we can observe. His athleticism, skill and knowledge we can all readily observe from his demonstrations and movies. There are legitimate question marks about his fighting ability.
Peter Archer said Bruce lee made Bob Wall look slow and Bruces athletiscm was too much for Bob Wall, and that Bob was having much difficulty.
But it don't matter to you. You are jealous of Lee so you will try to deny Bruce at every point.
Comment